IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/kngedp/2007_004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The technology transfer paradigm: a critique

Author

Listed:
  • Shamsavari, Ali

    (Kingston University London)

Abstract

An examination of certain central themes common to literature on technology transfer such as technological independence, appropriateness of technology and completeness of technology transfer. It is claimed that these and associated concepts form a coherent paradigm. The critique is based on contextual and historical analysis. Towards the end the paper deals with the central role of transnational corporation in transfer of technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Shamsavari, Ali, 2007. "The technology transfer paradigm: a critique," Economics Discussion Papers 2007-4, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:kngedp:2007_004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/1627/1/Shamsavari-A-1627.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frances Stewart, 1978. "Technology and Underdevelopment," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-1-349-15932-1, October.
    2. Shamsavari, Ali, 2005. "Global production networks and linkages: a new development perspective," Economics Discussion Papers 2005-3, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    3. Shamsavari, Ali & Taha, Yasser & Adikibi, Owen, 2002. "Technology and technology transfer: some basic issues," Economics Discussion Papers 2002-5, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    4. Albert O. Hirschman, 1968. "The Political Economy of Import-Substituting Industrialization in Latin America," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 82(1), pages 1-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shamsavari, Ali & Majidpour, Mehdi, 2008. "Innovation in technology transfer: host-oriented strategic R&D alliance," Economics Discussion Papers 2008-4, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    2. Rian Marais & Sara S. Grobbelaar & Imke H. de Kock, 2020. "Healthcare Technology Transfer in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Inductive Approach," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(08), pages 1-39, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shamsavari, Ali & Majidpour, Mehdi, 2008. "Innovation in technology transfer: host-oriented strategic R&D alliance," Economics Discussion Papers 2008-4, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    2. Waterbury, John, 1999. "The Long Gestation and Brief Triumph of Import-Substituting Industrialization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 323-341, February.
    3. Bahar, Dany & Rosenow, Samuel & Stein, Ernesto & Wagner, Rodrigo, 2019. "Export take-offs and acceleration: Unpacking cross-sector linkages in the evolution of comparative advantage," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 48-60.
    4. Marc Badia†Miró & Anna Carreras†Marín & Christopher M. Meissner, 2018. "Geography, policy, or productivity? Regional trade in five South American countries, 1910–50," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 71(1), pages 236-266, February.
    5. Haiwen Zhou, 2013. "The Choice of Technology and Rural-Urban Migration in Economic Development," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 8(3), pages 337-361, September.
    6. Daron Acemoglu & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2001. "Productivity Differences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(2), pages 563-606.
    7. OYAMA, Daisuke & SATO, Yasuhiro & TABUCHI, Takatoshi & THISSE, Jacques-François, 2009. "On the impact of trade on industrial structures : The role of entry cost heterogeneity," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2009046, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    8. Thomas Aronsson & Sugata Ghosh & Ronald Wendner, 2023. "Positional preferences and efficiency in a dynamic economy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(2), pages 311-337, August.
    9. repec:ilo:ilowps:281143 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Landesmann, Michael A, 2022. "Luigi Pasinetti on growth and structural change in international economic relations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 556-564.
    11. Christine Greenhalgh, 2013. "Science, Technology, Innovation and IP in India: New Directions and Prospects," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2013n37, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    12. Jerzmanowski, Michal & Tamura, Robert, 2019. "Directed technological change & cross-country income differences: A quantitative analysis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Haiwen Zhou & Ruhai Zhou, 2016. "A Dynamic Model of the Choice of Technology in Economic Development," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 11(3), pages 498-518, September.
    14. Srinivas, Smita & Sutz, Judith, 2008. "Developing countries and innovation: Searching for a new analytical approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 129-140.
    15. Mauro Boianovsky, 2010. "A View from the Tropics: Celso Furtado and the Theory of Economic Development in the 1950s," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 221-266, Summer.
    16. Jeffrey James & Haider A. Khan, 1998. "The Employment Effects of an Income Redistribution in Developing Countries," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Technological Systems and Development, chapter 5, pages 87-104, Palgrave Macmillan.
    17. Joanna Chataway, 2005. "Introduction: is it possible to create pro-poor agriculture-related biotechnology?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(5), pages 597-610.
    18. Christian Volpe Martincus & Andrés Gallo, 2009. "Institutions and Export Specialization: Just Direct Effects?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 129-149, February.
    19. Lema, Rasmus & Bhamidipati, Padmasai Lakshmi & Gregersen, Cecilia & Hansen, Ulrich Elmer & Kirchherr, Julian, 2021. "China’s investments in renewable energy in Africa: Creating co-benefits or just cashing-in?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Andrey E. Shastitko & Anna I. Meleshkina & Olga A. Markova, 2021. "The market regulation triad: Antitrust, industrial policy and protectionism in the optical fiber market," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 47-61, March.
    21. Voeten, J.J., 2012. "Understanding responsible innovation in small producers’ clusters in Northern Vietnam : A grounded theory approach to globalization and poverty alleviation," Other publications TiSEM e01da02b-ef2b-47c9-8d06-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Technology transfer; technological dependence; appropriate and complete technology transfer; the role of transnational enterprise;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:kngedp:2007_004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrea Ingianni (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sekinuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.