IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-24-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consideration of Environmental Justice in EPA’s Regulatory Analyses: A Review and Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Morgenstern, Richard D.

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Ünel, Burçin
  • Wolverton, Ann
  • DeAngeli, Emma

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Increasingly, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts environmental justice (EJ) assessments as part of its regulatory analyses for new rules. We inventory and evaluate the available EJ analyses for the EPA’s 68 economically significant final rules issued between 2012 and 2024. We find that three-quarters (53) of these rules include an EJ analysis, and 45 of these analyses are at least partially quantitative. The proportion of rules that include an EJ analysis increased from about 60 percent in 2012 to more than 90 percent within the past three years. While many of the quantitative EJ analyses examined only baseline issues, some of the more recent assessments have used more nuanced methods to assess differences in vulnerability, cumulative impacts, and climate risk. Three EJ analyses consider the incidence of costs across population groups. While recognizing the different budget, data, and modeling constraints across EPA program offices, we emphasize the need to consider EJ at the early stages of the analytical process. We also discuss important gaps in data and methods that are key to examining the underlying heterogeneity in concentrations and health risks, EJ impacts of regulatory options, regulatory costs, and net benefits across demographic groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Morgenstern, Richard D. & Ünel, Burçin & Wolverton, Ann & DeAngeli, Emma, 2024. "Consideration of Environmental Justice in EPA’s Regulatory Analyses: A Review and Assessment," RFF Working Paper Series 24-22, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-24-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4713/WP_24-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-24-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.