IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-24-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Offshore Wind Power Examined: Effects, Benefits, and Costs of Offshore Wind Farms Along the US Atlantic and Gulf Coasts

Author

Listed:
  • Robson, Sally

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Russell, Ethan

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Shawhan, Daniel

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Electricity from offshore wind is considered important for reducing energy-related emissions because of its ability to serve coastal areas and complement other nonemitting electricity sources. However, there are open questions about the degree to which it will replace emitting versus other nonemitting generation, improve public health, and affect the total cost of the electricity supply. In the face of recent input cost increases and project cancellations, governments are deciding how strongly to support offshore wind development. To help with such decisions, we project and evaluate several effects of a set of 32 planned or proposed offshore wind farms along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the United States, which would produce approximately 2.5 percent of US and Canadian electricity generation. We examine how those offshore wind farms would affect other electricity generation capacity, generation, emissions, health, costs for electricity and natural gas customers, profits of the electricity and natural gas supply industries, and net government revenues, in the year 2035. We include capital expenditure recovery and financing among the costs.In our modeling results, from a detailed power sector capacity expansion and dispatch model, the offshore wind farms’ estimated net benefits are positive, with an estimated benefit-to-cost ratio of 14 to 1. Generation from the offshore wind farms disproportionately reduces natural gas and coal-fueled generation, causing large emissions reductions. Further, the emissions reductions tend to be upwind of densely populated areas. Consequently, the offshore wind farms reduce annual estimated US premature deaths from airborne particulate matter and ground-level ozone by 520 per year. Black, Hispanic, and low-income Americans account for a disproportionately large share of the premature deaths avoided, as do residents of the New York City area. The offshore wind farms reduce worldwide projected future deaths from climate change by 1,600 per year of their operation. The offshore wind farms increase the overall nonenvironmental costs of the electricity supply but reduce customer electricity and natural gas bills. Though our study is relatively comprehensive, it, like others, does not include all benefits and costs. Notably, it does not include estimates of the likely downward effect of the 32 offshore wind farms on the cost of subsequent offshore wind development or the benefits of the increased future development that is likely to result.

Suggested Citation

  • Robson, Sally & Russell, Ethan & Shawhan, Daniel, 2024. "Offshore Wind Power Examined: Effects, Benefits, and Costs of Offshore Wind Farms Along the US Atlantic and Gulf Coasts," RFF Working Paper Series 24-17, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-24-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4752/WP_24-17_2.25_Update.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles A. Holt & Roger Sherman, 2014. "Risk Aversion and the Winner's Curse," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 81(1), pages 7-22, July.
    2. Gilbert E. Metcalf, 2018. "The Impact of Removing Tax Preferences for US Oil and Natural Gas Production: Measuring Tax Subsidies by an Equivalent Price Impact Approach," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-37.
    3. repec:wly:soecon:v:81:1:y:2014:p:7-22 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam Rose & Nathaniel Gundersen & Yamini Kumar & Joshua Jacobs & Isabel Reynoso & Najmedin Meshkati, 2024. "Benefits and Challenges of California Offshore Wind Electricity: An Updated Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prest, Brian C., 2020. "Supply-Side Reforms to Oil and Gas Production on Federal Lands: Modeling the Implications for Climate Emissions, Revenues, and Production Shifts," RFF Working Paper Series 20-16, Resources for the Future.
    2. Jonathan Doh & Pawan Budhwar & Geoffrey Wood, 2021. "Long-term energy transitions and international business: Concepts, theory, methods, and a research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 951-970, July.
    3. Richard G. Newell & Brian C. Prest, 2019. "The Unconventional Oil Supply Boom: Aggregate Price Response from Microdata," The Energy Journal, , vol. 40(3), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Brown, Jason P. & Maniloff, Peter & Manning, Dale T., 2020. "Spatially variable taxation and resource extraction: The impact of state oil taxes on drilling in the US," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Thomas, Pinky & Collins, Alan & Etienne, Xiaoli & Mugabe, Douglas, 2024. "Impacts of state tax and resource ownership policies on extraction: Evidence from U.S. natural gas production," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Edward B. Barbier, 2020. "Greening the Post-pandemic Recovery in the G20," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 685-703, August.
    7. John Grimaldo-Guerrero & Juan Rivera-Alvarado & Jainer Acosta-Bustamante & Tulio Cabeza-Abello & Jose Osorio-Tovar, 2024. "Colombian Oil Energy Security through a Framework of Risks and Vulnerabilities," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 479-486, September.
    8. Michael Lazarus & Harro van Asselt, 2018. "Fossil fuel supply and climate policy: exploring the road less taken," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 1-13, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-24-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.