IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed018/694.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Self-justi ed equilibria: Existence and computation

Author

Listed:
  • Felix Kubler

    (University of Zurich)

  • Simon Scheidegger

    (University of Zurich)

Abstract

In this paper we introduce self-justi ed equilibrium as a solution concept in stochastic general equilibrium models with a large number of heterogeneous agents. In each period agents trade in assets to maximize the sum of current utility and forecasted future utility. Current prices ensure that markets clear and agents forecast the probability distribution of future prices and consumption on the basis of current endogenous variables and the current exogenous shock. The forecasts are self-justi ed in the sense that agents use forecasting functions that are optimal within a given class of functions and that can be viewed as optimally trading o the accuracy of the forecast and its complexity. We show that self-justi ed equilibria always exist and we develop a computational method to approximate them numerically. By restricting the complexity of agents' forecasts we can solve models with a very large number of heterogeneous agents. Errors can be directly interpreted.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix Kubler & Simon Scheidegger, 2018. "Self-justi ed equilibria: Existence and computation," 2018 Meeting Papers 694, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    • Handle: RePEc:red:sed018:694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2018/paper_694.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Truman F. Bewley, 1984. "Fiscal and Monetary Policy in a General Equilibrium Model," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 690, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    2. Krueger, Dirk & Kubler, Felix, 2004. "Computing equilibrium in OLG models with stochastic production," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1411-1436, April.
    3. Judd, Kenneth L. & Maliar, Lilia & Maliar, Serguei & Valero, Rafael, 2014. "Smolyak method for solving dynamic economic models: Lagrange interpolation, anisotropic grid and adaptive domain," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 92-123.
    4. Johannes Brumm & Simon Scheidegger, 2017. "Using Adaptive Sparse Grids to Solve High‐Dimensional Dynamic Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1575-1612, September.
    5. Ljungqvist, Lars & Sargent, Thomas J., 2012. "Recursive Macroeconomic Theory, Third Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 3, volume 1, number 0262018748, April.
    6. Citanna, Alessandro & Siconolfi, Paolo, 2012. "Recursive equilibrium in stochastic OLG economies: Incomplete markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 322-337.
    7. Felix Kubler & Karl Schmedders, 2003. "Stationary Equilibria in Asset-Pricing Models with Incomplete Markets and Collateral," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1767-1793, November.
    8. Johannes Brumm & Dominika Kryczka & Felix Kubler, 2017. "Recursive Equilibria in Dynamic Economies With Stochastic Production," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1467-1499, September.
    9. Feldman, Mark & Gilles, Christian, 1985. "An expository note on individual risk without aggregate uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 26-32, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurence Kotlikoff & Felix Kubler & Andrey Polbin & Simon Scheidegger, 2021. "Pareto-improving carbon-risk taxation [The environment and directed technical change]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 36(107), pages 551-589.
    2. Jesús Fernández‐Villaverde & Samuel Hurtado & Galo Nuño, 2023. "Financial Frictions and the Wealth Distribution," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(3), pages 869-901, May.
    3. Kubler, Felix & Scheidegger, Simon, 2023. "Uniformly self-justified equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. Michael Reiter, 2019. "Solving Heterogeneous Agent Models with Non-convex Optimization Problems: Linearization and Beyond %," 2019 Meeting Papers 1048, Society for Economic Dynamics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kubler, Felix & Scheidegger, Simon, 2023. "Uniformly self-justified equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Aryan Eftekhari & Simon Scheidegger, 2022. "High-Dimensional Dynamic Stochastic Model Representation," Papers 2202.06555, arXiv.org.
    3. Julien Albertini & Stéphane Moyen, 2020. "A General and Efficient Method for Solving Regime-Switching DSGE Models," Working Papers 2035, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    4. Pascal, Julien, 2024. "Artificial neural networks to solve dynamic programming problems: A bias-corrected Monte Carlo operator," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Philipp Renner & Simon Scheidegger, 2017. "Machine learning for dynamic incentive problems," Working Papers 203620397, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    6. Dennis, Richard, 2024. "Using a hyperbolic cross to solve non-linear macroeconomic models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    7. Marlon Azinovic & Luca Gaegauf & Simon Scheidegger, 2022. "Deep Equilibrium Nets," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1471-1525, November.
    8. Cao, Dan, 2020. "Recursive equilibrium in Krusell and Smith (1998)," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Fernández-Villaverde, J. & Rubio-Ramírez, J.F. & Schorfheide, F., 2016. "Solution and Estimation Methods for DSGE Models," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & Harald Uhlig (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 527-724, Elsevier.
    10. S. Bogan Aruoba & Pablo Cuba-Borda & Kenji Higa-Flores & Frank Schorfheide & Sergio Villalvazo, 2021. "Piecewise-Linear Approximations and Filtering for DSGE Models with Occasionally Binding Constraints," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 41, pages 96-120, July.
    11. Lilia Maliar & Serguei Maliar & John B. Taylor & Inna Tsener, 2020. "A tractable framework for analyzing a class of nonstationary Markov models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 1289-1323, November.
    12. Victor Duarte & Diogo Duarte & Dejanir H. Silva, 2024. "Machine Learning for Continuous-Time Finance," CESifo Working Paper Series 10909, CESifo.
    13. Kristensen, Dennis & Mogensen, Patrick K. & Moon, Jong Myun & Schjerning, Bertel, 2021. "Solving dynamic discrete choice models using smoothing and sieve methods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 328-360.
    14. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langren'e & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2018. "Local Control Regression: Improving the Least Squares Monte Carlo Method for Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1803.11467, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    15. Jesús Fernández‐Villaverde & Oren Levintal, 2018. "Solution methods for models with rare disasters," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(2), pages 903-944, July.
    16. Schesch, Constantin, 2024. "Pseudospectral methods for continuous-time heterogeneous-agent models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    17. Dan Cao & Wenlan Luo & Guangyu Nie, 2023. "Global GDSGE Models," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 199-225, December.
    18. Geng, Runjie & Kubler, Felix, 2023. "Stochastic overlapping generations with non-convex budget sets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6bl2553ksc9vlq1fltjs9h1cht is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Isaiah Hull & Or Sattath & Eleni Diamanti & Göran Wendin, 2024. "Quantum Technology for Economists," Contributions to Economics, Springer, number 978-3-031-50780-9, March.
    21. Coeurdacier, Nicolas & Rey, Hélène & Winant, Pablo, 2020. "Financial integration and growth in a risky world," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-21.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed018:694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.