IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed018/1066.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A three mutual fund separation theorem

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Alvarez

    (University of Chicago)

Abstract

We analyze a one period economy with CARA preferences, and normally distributed aggregate risk. We allow an arbitrary distribution of (dogmatic) beliefs on the expected value and variance of the aggregate risk, as well as on the agent’s risk tolerance param- eter. We show that there is a representative agent whose risk tolerance, and beliefs over expected value and variance are appropriately defined weighted averages of the same objects across all agents. We show a type of 3 fund separation theorem: any efficient allocation can be decentralized with three asset: an uncontingent bond, a Lucas’s tree, and a simple variance swap –whose price is given by the SVIX index, an index closely related to VIX, given by the the price of a portfolio of out of the money puts and calls. We give simple expressions for the relative prices of these securities in terms of the representative agent’s parameters. We also give simple expressions for each agent’s holding on the Lucas’ tree and the simple variance swap as function of the agent’s differences with the representative agent’s values. The main novelty of the setup is the explicit role for a simple variance swap –or the portfolio of puts and calls– in the decentralization of efficient allocations. In equilibrium there are different positions in the the variance swap –or to the options portfolio– if and only if there is heterogeneity in the beliefs of the aggregate risk of the economy, and hence these heterogeneity maps into trade volume. To understand the role of different assumption we also study the case of arbitrary belief and utility function for a small noise. Finally, we extend the results to a multiperiod setting, for which they hold conditionally on the history for each period.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Alvarez, 2018. "A three mutual fund separation theorem," 2018 Meeting Papers 1066, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed018:1066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2018/paper_1066.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen A. Ross, 2005. "Mutual Fund Separation in Financial Theory—The Separating Distributions," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Sudipto Bhattacharya & George M Constantinides (ed.), Theory Of Valuation, chapter 10, pages 309-356, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Paul A. Samuelson, 1970. "The Fundamental Approximation Theorem of Portfolio Analysis in terms of Means, Variances and Higher Moments," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 37(4), pages 537-542.
    3. Ian Martin, 2011. "Simple Variance Swaps," NBER Working Papers 16884, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Merton, Robert C, 1973. "An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(5), pages 867-887, September.
    5. Fousseni Chabi-Yo & Eric Ghysels & Eric Renault, 2008. "On Portfolio Separation Theorems with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Attitudes towards Risk," Staff Working Papers 08-16, Bank of Canada.
    6. Chen, An & Pelsser, Antoon & Vellekoop, Michel, 2011. "Modeling non-monotone risk aversion using SAHARA utility functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(5), pages 2075-2092, September.
    7. Chabi-Yo, Fousseni & Leisen, Dietmar P.J. & Renault, Eric, 2014. "Aggregation of preferences for skewed asset returns," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 453-489.
    8. Cass, David & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 1970. "The structure of investor preferences and asset returns, and separability in portfolio allocation: A contribution to the pure theory of mutual funds," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 122-160, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gourieroux, C. & Monfort, A., 2005. "The econometrics of efficient portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 1-41, January.
    2. Michele Costola & Bertrand Maillet & Zhining Yuan & Xiang Zhang, 2024. "Mean–variance efficient large portfolios: a simple machine learning heuristic technique based on the two-fund separation theorem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 334(1), pages 133-155, March.
    3. Dybvig, Philip & Liu, Fang, 2018. "On investor preferences and mutual fund separation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 224-260.
    4. Sangwon Suh & Wonho Song & Bong-Soo Lee, 2014. "A new method for forming asset pricing factors from firm characteristics," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(28), pages 3463-3482, October.
    5. Walter Schachermayer & Mihai Sîrbu & Erik Taflin, 2009. "In which financial markets do mutual fund theorems hold true?," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 49-77, January.
    6. Fousseni Chabi-Yo & Eric Ghysels & Eric Renault, 2008. "On Portfolio Separation Theorems with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Attitudes towards Risk," Staff Working Papers 08-16, Bank of Canada.
    7. Gregory Phelan & Alexis Akira Toda, 2015. "On the Robustness of Theoretical Asset Pricing Models," Department of Economics Working Papers 2015-10, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    8. Kim, In Joon & Kim, So Jung & Yoon, Sun-Joong, 2014. "A dark side of international capital market integration: Domestic investors' view," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 238-256.
    9. Sylvain Chassang, 2016. "Mostly Prior-Free Asset Allocation," Working Papers 077_2016, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Econometric Research Program..
    10. Turan G. Bali & Hao Zhou, 2011. "Risk, uncertainty, and expected returns," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2011-45, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    11. ,, 2007. "Two-fund separation in dynamic general equilibrium," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 2(2), June.
    12. Ian Martin, 2017. "What is the Expected Return on the Market?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(1), pages 367-433.
    13. Kais Dachraoui & Georges Dionne, 2007. "Conditions Ensuring the Decomposition of Asset Demand for All Risk-Averse Investors," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 397-404.
    14. Benjamin M. Friedman & V. Vance Roley, 1985. "Aspects of Investor Behavior Under Risk," NBER Working Papers 1611, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. David S. Jones & V. Vance Roley, 1981. "Bliss Points in Mean-Variance Portfolio Models," NBER Technical Working Papers 0019, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Zura Kakushadze & Willie Yu, 2016. "Multifactor Risk Models and Heterotic CAPM," Papers 1602.04902, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    17. JÊrÆme B. Detemple & Piero Gottardi, 1998. "Aggregation, efficiency and mutual fund separation in incomplete markets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 11(2), pages 443-455.
    18. DeMarzo, Peter & Skiadas, Costis, 1998. "Aggregation, Determinacy, and Informational Efficiency for a Class of Economies with Asymmetric Information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 123-152, May.
    19. Benjamin M. Friedman, 1985. "Crowding Out or Crowding In? Evidence on Debt-Equity Substitutability," NBER Working Papers 1565, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Chr. Framstad, Nils, 2011. "Portfolio Separation with -symmetric and Psuedo-isotropic Distributions," Memorandum 12/2011, Oslo University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed018:1066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.