IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rdg/repxwp/rep-wp2010-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fit for Planning? An Evaluation of the Application of Development Viability Appraisal Models in the UK Planning System

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Crosby

    (School of Real Estate & Planning, Henley Business School, University of Reading)

  • Pat McAllister

    (School of Real Estate & Planning, Henley Business School, University of Reading)

  • Peter Wyatt

    (School of Real Estate & Planning, Henley Business School, University of Reading)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to critically examine the application of development appraisal to viability assessment in the planning system. This evaluation is of development appraisal models in general and also their use in particular applications associated with estimating planning obligation capacity. The paper is organised into four themes: á¹– The context and conceptual basis for development viability appraisal á¹– A review of development viability appraisal methods á¹– A discussion of selected key inputs into a development viability appraisal á¹– A discussion of the applications of development viability appraisals in the planning system. It is assumed that readers are familiar with the basic models and information needs of development viability appraisal rather than at the cutting edge of practice and/or academe.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Crosby & Pat McAllister & Peter Wyatt, "undated". "Fit for Planning? An Evaluation of the Application of Development Viability Appraisal Models in the UK Planning System," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2010-10, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    • Handle: RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2010-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reading.ac.uk/rep/fulltxt/1010.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Donna & Gilbert, Catherine & Rowley, Steven & Gurran, Nicole & Leishman, Chris & Mouritz, Mike & Raynor, Katrina & Cornell, Christen, 2020. "Urban regulation and diverse housing supply: An Investigative Panel," SocArXiv k49pd, Center for Open Science.
    2. Charlotte Coleman & Neil Crosby & Pat McAllister & Pete Wyatt, 2013. "Development appraisal in practice: some evidence from the planning system," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 144-165, June.
    3. Artioli, Francesca, 2021. "Sale of public land as a financing instrument. The unspoken political choices and distributional effects of land-based solutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Patrick McAllister & Emma Street & Peter Wyatt, 2016. "Governing calculative practices: An investigation of development viability modelling in the English planning system," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(11), pages 2363-2379, August.
    5. Neil Crosby & Peter Wyatt, 2016. "Financial viability appraisals for site-specific planning decisions in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1716-1733, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2010-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marie Pearson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsrdguk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.