IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jpropr/v30y2013i2p144-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development appraisal in practice: some evidence from the planning system

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Coleman
  • Neil Crosby
  • Pat McAllister
  • Pete Wyatt

Abstract

Due to the requirement to demonstrate financial feasibility of policy proposals and scheme-specific planning obligations, development viability and development appraisal have become core themes in the English planning system. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the application of development appraisal in practice. The paper reviews the literature and the models available to assess the viability of development and analyses a sample 19 development viability appraisals to identify practice. The paper concludes that the practice of development appraisal deviates significantly from the tenets of capital budgeting theory. In particular, in addition to a propensity to oversimplify the timing of income and expenditure, the way in which debt, developer’s return and value and cost change are handled in practice illustrates a major gap between mainstream capital budgeting theory and development appraisal in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Coleman & Neil Crosby & Pat McAllister & Pete Wyatt, 2013. "Development appraisal in practice: some evidence from the planning system," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 144-165, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:30:y:2013:i:2:p:144-165
    DOI: 10.1080/09599916.2012.750620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09599916.2012.750620
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09599916.2012.750620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil Crosby & Pat McAllister & Peter Wyatt, "undated". "Fit for Planning? An Evaluation of the Application of Development Viability Appraisal Models in the UK Planning System," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2010-10, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Donna & Gilbert, Catherine & Rowley, Steven & Gurran, Nicole & Leishman, Chris & Mouritz, Mike & Raynor, Katrina & Cornell, Christen, 2020. "Urban regulation and diverse housing supply: An Investigative Panel," SocArXiv k49pd, Center for Open Science.
    2. Artioli, Francesca, 2021. "Sale of public land as a financing instrument. The unspoken political choices and distributional effects of land-based solutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Neil Crosby & Peter Wyatt, 2016. "Financial viability appraisals for site-specific planning decisions in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1716-1733, December.
    4. Patrick McAllister & Emma Street & Peter Wyatt, 2016. "Governing calculative practices: An investigation of development viability modelling in the English planning system," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(11), pages 2363-2379, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:30:y:2013:i:2:p:144-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJPR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.