IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qss/dqsswp/2208.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Teenage children of mothers who experienced out-of-home care: How are they doing?

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Parsons

    (Social Research Institute, UCL)

  • Ingrid Schoon

    (Social Research Institute, UCL)

  • Emla Fitzsimons

    (Social Research Institute, UCL)

Abstract

It is well documented that care-leavers tend to experience more problematic post-16 transitions and outcomes compared to their peers, but less is known about the intergenerational transmission of disadvantages to their children. This research addresses several of the key areas of concern identified in the 2013 Care Leaver Strategy – education, employment, health including health- and risky-behaviours, crime – to help inform strategies to assist agencies working with care-leavers, in particular care-leavers who became parents and who might be struggling across domains. This study draws on the UK Millennium Cohort Study to examine the experiences of 16-18-year-old children of mothers who experienced out-of-home care during their childhoods (n=305) in comparison to children whose mothers were not in care (n=18,505). After accounting for the teenager’s sex, age, ethnicity, results in public examinations at age 16 and family socio-economic background measures together with the level of area deprivation they encounter, we find that the teenage children of care-experienced mothers have similar aspirations regarding attending university or entering a professional occupation, and they were just as likely to be in employment, education or training at age 17 as their peers. However, they were more likely than their peers to experience a range of poorer health outcomes and health behaviours: they reported higher levels of behavioural and mental health problems, including self-harm and suicide attempts; higher levels of illegal drug use and more had been cautioned by the police. The wellbeing of the most disadvantaged families in our society clearly needs to be better addressed if we are to minimise the intergenerational transmission of disadvantage associated with care experience being passed on to children in future generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Parsons & Ingrid Schoon & Emla Fitzsimons, 2022. "Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Teenage children of mothers who experienced out-of-home care: How are they doing?," DoQSS Working Papers 22-08, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
  • Handle: RePEc:qss:dqsswp:2208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.ioe.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp2208.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chelsea L. Shover & Corey S. Davis & Sanford C. Gordon & Keith Humphreys, 2019. "Association between medical cannabis laws and opioid overdose mortality has reversed over time," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116(26), pages 12624-12626, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cornelius A. Rietveld & Pankaj C. Patel, 2021. "Prescription opioids and new business establishments," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1175-1199, October.
    2. Cheng, Stephanie F. & De Franco, Gus & Lin, Pengkai, 2023. "Marijuana liberalization and public finance: A capital market perspective on the passage of medical use laws," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    3. Coleman Drake & Jiebing Wen & Jesse Hinde & Hefei Wen, 2021. "Recreational cannabis laws and opioid‐related emergency department visit rates," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(10), pages 2595-2605, September.
    4. Cornelius A. Rietveld & Pankaj C. Patel, 0. "Prescription opioids and new business establishments," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-25.
    5. Shyam Raman & Ashley C. Bradford, 2022. "Recreational cannabis legalizations associated with reductions in prescription drug utilization among Medicaid enrollees," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), pages 1513-1521, July.
    6. Sabia, Joseph J. & Dave, Dhaval & Alotaibi, Fawaz & Rees, Daniel I., 2024. "The effects of recreational marijuana laws on drug use and crime," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Dmitry Arkhangelsky & Guido W. Imbens & Lihua Lei & Xiaoman Luo, 2021. "Design-Robust Two-Way-Fixed-Effects Regression For Panel Data," Papers 2107.13737, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    8. Marinello, Samantha & Powell, Lisa M., 2023. "The impact of recreational cannabis markets on motor vehicle accident, suicide, and opioid overdose fatalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    9. Anderson, D. Mark & Rees, Daniel I., 2021. "The Public Health Effects of Legalizing Marijuana," IZA Discussion Papers 14292, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Junxing Chay & Seonghoon Kim, 2022. "Heterogeneous health effects of medical marijuana legalization: Evidence from young adults in the United States," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 269-283, February.
    11. Sunday Azagba & Lingpeng Shan & Lauren Manzione & Fares Qeadan & Mark Wolfson, 2019. "Trends in Opioid Misuse among Marijuana Users and Non-Users in the U.S. from 2007–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-11, November.
    12. Mathur, Neil K. & Ruhm, Christopher J., 2023. "Marijuana legalization and opioid deaths," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Grant W. Neeley & Lilliard E. Richardson Jr., 2022. "Marijuana Policy Bundles in the American States Over Time and Their Impact on the Use of Marijuana and Other Drugs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 46(2), pages 165-199, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    out-of-home care; mothers; disadvantage; intergeneration transmission;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qss:dqsswp:2208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr Neus Bover Fonts (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dqioeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.