IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qsh/wpaper/242036.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The redesign of the medical intern assignment mechanism in Israel

Author

Listed:
  • Alvin E. Roth
  • Ran I. Shorrer

Abstract

A collaboration of medical professionals with economists and computer scientists involved in ?market design? had led to the redesign of the clearinghouse assigning medical students to internships in Israel. The new mechanism presents significant efficiency gains relative to the previous one, and almost all students get a better chance of getting what they want. Continued monitoring of the new mechanism is required to verify that it is not abused, and explore whether it can be improved. Other organizations in Israel may also be able to profit from the experience that accumulates from market design, both in Israel and abroad.

Suggested Citation

  • Alvin E. Roth & Ran I. Shorrer, "undated". "The redesign of the medical intern assignment mechanism in Israel," Working Paper 242036, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    • Handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:242036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scholar.harvard.edu/ran/node/242036
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ran I. Shorrer & Sandor Sovago, 2017. "Obvious Mistakes in a Strategically Simple College Admissions Environment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-107/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:5:p:727-740 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Jens Gudmundsson, 2019. "Compromises and Rewards: stable and non-manipulable probabilistic matching," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(2), pages 365-392, June.
    4. Ariel Rosenfeld & Avinatan Hassidim, 2020. "Too smart for their own good: Trading truthfulness for efficiency in the Israeli medical internship market," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(5), pages 727-740, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:242036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Brandon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbrssus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.