IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/97742.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Schumpeter, the Banking System, and Innovation: Small versus Big Business

Author

Listed:
  • Lambert, Thomas
  • Velardo, Tristan

Abstract

Joseph Schumpeter’s writings on entrepreneurship and innovation have had a profound impact on economic theory and economic thought. Schumpeter initially saw the small entrepreneur as the source of innovation and economic growth within an economic system but later saw large corporations as the source of much innovation. Because large corporations, and in modern times many governments and universities as well, play such a large role in funding research and development and new innovations, much of the bank financing of innovation is done by smaller banks for small entrepreneurs and their ideas. Venture capitalists and self-financing are the other two major forms of small entrepreneur/small business financing. Meanwhile, the financial markets (stocks and bond markets) only indirectly play a role in funding the innovation of large corporations via changes in these firms’ stock prices. Changes in stock prices reflect an estimate of the large firms’ research and development efforts and their prospects for profitable, future innovation. Much corporate research and development is financed internally within the organization as an expense of doing business. Meanwhile, government and university funding through tax dollars and non-profit sources indirectly subsidize corporate innovation because governmental entities and universities take on risks that the private sector will often not tolerate. Yet, large corporations are often the beneficiaries of such governmental and university financing of research and development efforts. In today’s times, Schumpeter would be impressed with the success of large firms regarding innovation but probably would be disappointed about the marginalization of the small entrepreneurial firm and the banking system and their diminished roles in innovation. This paper summarizes Schumpeter’s views on how the banking system and financial markets could play a role in innovation and explains how a modern day monopoly capital system (Baran and Sweezy 1966) and its financial system have transformed entrepreneurship and innovation away from small business and innovation by the small entrepreneur. Baran, Paul A, and Paul M Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lambert, Thomas & Velardo, Tristan, 2019. "Schumpeter, the Banking System, and Innovation: Small versus Big Business," MPRA Paper 97742, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:97742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/97742/1/MPRA_paper_97742.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Pierre Potier, 2015. "Joseph A. Schumpeter et la conjoncture économique des années 1930-1940 : dépression, stagnation ou signes avant-coureurs du déclin du capitalisme ?," Post-Print halshs-01223213, HAL.
    2. Agnes Festre & Eric Nasica, 2009. "Schumpeter on money, banking and finance: an institutionalist perspective," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 325-356.
    3. Pierre Dockès, 2015. "Les débats sur la stagnation séculaire dans les années 1937-1950 : Hansen-Terborgh et Schumpeter-Sweezy," Post-Print halshs-01223205, HAL.
    4. Pierre Dockès, 2015. "Les débats sur la stagnation séculaire dans les années 1937-1950. Hansen-Terborgh et Schumpeter-Sweezy," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 66(5), pages 967-992.
    5. Blaug,Mark, 1997. "Economic Theory in Retrospect," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521577014, January.
    6. Thomas E Lambert, 2019. "Monopoly capital and entrepreneurship: whither small business?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(6), pages 1577-1595.
    7. Lambert, Thomas, 2017. "Monopoly Capital and Entrepreneurism: Whither Small Business?," MPRA Paper 75999, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Kamien,Morton I. & Schwartz,Nancy L., 1982. "Market Structure and Innovation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521293853, December.
    9. Eric Nasica & Agnès Festré, 2009. "Schumpeter on money, banking and finance: an institutionalist perspective," Post-Print halshs-00720753, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Havran, Dániel, 2017. "Schumpeter a tőkepiacon. Schumpeter finanszírozási elméletének fejlődése és életrajzi vonatkozásai [Schumpeter on the capital market: the evolution and biographical relations of Schumpeter's credit," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1056-1072.
    2. Festré, Agnès & Garrouste, Pierre, 2016. "Wieser As A Theorist Of Institutional Change," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(4), pages 463-483, December.
    3. Philippe Aghion & Agnès Festré, 2017. "Schumpeterian growth theory, Schumpeter, and growth policy design," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 25-42, January.
    4. Rahmeyer Fritz, 2013. "Schumpeter, Marshall, and Neo-Schumpeterian Evolutionary Economics: A Critical Stocktaking," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 233(1), pages 39-64, February.
    5. Callegari, Beniamino & Nybakk, Erlend, 2022. "Schumpeterian theory and research on forestry innovation and entrepreneurship: The state of the art, issues and an agenda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Xiuxiu Jiang & Xia Wang & Jia Ren & Zhimin Xie, 2021. "The Nexus between Digital Finance and Economic Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Cristiano Antonelli & Christophe Feder, 2023. "The foundations of Schumpeterian dynamics: The European evidence," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 65-96, January.
    8. Thomas E. Lambert, 2020. "Monopoly capital and innovation: an exploratory assessment of R&D effectiveness," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 36-49, January.
    9. Carlos González-Rossano & Antonia Terán-Bustamante & Marisol Velázquez-Salazar & Antonieta Martínez-Velasco, 2023. "What Drives Profit Income in Mexico’s Main Banks? Evidence Using Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Servaas Storm, 2018. "Financialization and Economic Development: A Debate on the Social Efficiency of Modern Finance," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 302-329, March.
    11. Mário Graça Moura, 2017. "Schumpeter and the meanings of rationality," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 115-138, January.
    12. repec:eur:ejesjr:381 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Lorenzo Esposito & Giuseppe Mastromatteo, "undated". "In the Long Run We Are All Herd: On the Nature and Outcomes of the Beauty Contest," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_972, Levy Economics Institute.
    14. Herrmann, Roland & Schröck, Rebecca, 2011. "Determinanten des Innovationserfolgs: eine Analyse mit Scannerdaten für den deutschen Joghurtmarkt," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(03), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Gilberto Tadeu Lima, 2000. "Market concentration and technological innovation in a dynamic model of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 447-475.
    16. Symeonidis, George, 2001. "Price Competition, Innovation and Profitability: Theory and UK Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 2816, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    18. Tomasz Grodzicki & Mateusz Jankiewicz, 2020. "Forecasting the Level of Unemployment, Inflation and Wages: The Case of Sweden," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 400-409.
    19. Park, Walter G., 1997. "A note on innovation and patent protection: Intertemporal imitation-risk smoothing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 185-189, February.
    20. Colombo, Massimo G. & Garrone, Paola, 1998. "Common carriers' entry into multimedia services," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 77-105, March.
    21. Salvacruz, Joseph C., 1996. "Competitiveness Of The United States And The Asean In The International Agricultural Market," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 1-9, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    banking; innovation; small business; big business;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B26 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Financial Economics
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • B51 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:97742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.