IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/97281.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An analysis of the effect between firm's performance and determinant of liquidity ratio of Revlon Incorporation in cosmetic industry

Author

Listed:
  • LAM, ALEXIS LAM MAN YEE

Abstract

The reason why I conduct this analysis is to identify the corporate governance and company performance of the Revlon Incorporation using the dependent variable (ROA) and plus the independent variable (current ratio) involve the internal factor and external factor. The data is collected through the Revlon Incorporation’s annual report from the year of 2014 until 2018. The variable that are using during this analysis which is dependent variable and independent variable using ROA and current ratio for the purpose to analyze the Revlon Incorporation’s corporate governance and company performance. Return on assets (ROA) is prove of how profitable of a certain company about their total assets. ROA help manager, investor on how to conduct an efficient of a company’s management to generate earnings. Since Revlon Incorporation company asset’s main and important purpose is to earn huge amount of profits, the Revlon Incorporation is manage to manage successfully in converting the investments from assets into profits. The ROA is a profit to the Revlon Incorporation from the investment when the Revlon Incorporation’s assets are the most imperative investment for every companies in the world. A higher the Return On Assets prove that the management of Revlon Incorporation is using the Revlon Incorporation company’s assets to make more profit. The current ratio is the medium to help in measuring for the liquidity which is the higher the ROA, the higher the current ratio to solve the company’s financial obligations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lam, Alexis Lam Man Yee, 2019. "An analysis of the effect between firm's performance and determinant of liquidity ratio of Revlon Incorporation in cosmetic industry," MPRA Paper 97281, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Nov 2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:97281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/97281/1/MPRA_paper_97281.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bauer, Rob & Frijns, Bart & Otten, Rogér & Tourani-Rad, Alireza, 2008. "The impact of corporate governance on corporate performance: Evidence from Japan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 236-251, June.
    2. Aebi, Vincent & Sabato, Gabriele & Schmid, Markus, 2012. "Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3213-3226.
    3. Lang, William W. & Jagtiani, Julapa, 2010. "The Mortgage Financial Crises: The Role of Credit Risk Management and Corporate Governance," Working Papers 10-12, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    4. William Lang & Julapa Jagtiani, 2010. "The Mortgage and Financial Crises: The Role of Credit Risk Management and Corporate Governance," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 38(3), pages 295-316, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walter Gontarek & Yacine Belghitar, 2018. "Risk governance: Examining its impact upon bank performance and risk‐taking," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 187-224, December.
    2. Muhammad Zeeshan Younas, 2020. "How Did Risk Management Methods Change After The 2007 Sub-Prime Mortgage Crisis In The United Kingdom?," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(1), pages 22-31, March.
    3. Chenguang Hu & Kyung Hwan Yun & Ziqi Su & Chang Xi, 2022. "Effective Crisis Management during Adversity: Organizing Resilience Capabilities of Firms and Sustainable Performance during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Michel Magnan & Garen Markarian, 2011. "Accounting, Governance and the Crisis: Is Risk the Missing Link?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 215-231.
    5. Özgür ÜÞENMEZ & Levent DUMAN, 2017. "Will Secular Stagnation be the Result of Great Recession," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 192-202, June.
    6. Bülbül, Dilek & Lambert, Claudia, 2012. "Credit portfolio modelling and its effect on capital requirements," Discussion Papers 11/2012, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    7. Juan Antonio Azkunaga & Leire San-Jose & Sara Urionabarrenetxea, 2013. "The impact of financial globalization and financialization on the economy in the current crisis through banking corporate governance," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 7(3), September.
    8. Chih Khiam Ping & Tan Seng Teck, 2020. "Corporate Governance: Voluntary, Mandatory or a Hybrid Approach?," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 233-236, January.
    9. Kakiya Grace Girangwa & Lucy Rono & Jared Mose, 2020. "The Influence of Enterprise Risk Management Practices on Organizational Performance: Evidence from Kenyan State Corporations," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 8(1), pages 11-20.
    10. Hussein Tarraf, 2011. "The Role Of Corporate Governance In The Events Leading Up To The Global Financial Crisis: Analysis Of Aggressive Risk-Taking," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(4), pages 93-105.
    11. Mollah, Sabur & Zaman, Mahbub, 2015. "Shari’ah supervision, corporate governance and performance: Conventional vs. Islamic banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 418-435.
    12. Alessandro Gennaro & Michelle Nietlispach, 2021. "Corporate Governance and Risk Management: Lessons (Not) Learnt from the Financial Crisis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Eckhard Hein & Daniel Detzer & Nina Dodig (ed.), 2015. "The Demise of Finance-dominated Capitalism," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16281.
    14. Donnelly, Grant & Iyer, Ravi & Howell, Ryan T., 2012. "The Big Five personality traits, material values, and financial well-being of self-described money managers," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1129-1142.
    15. Franklin Allen & Itay Goldstein & Julapa Jagtiani & William W. Lang, 2016. "Enhancing Prudential Standards in Financial Regulations," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 49(2), pages 133-149, June.
    16. Ali Akbar Arghand & Mahmood Alborzi & Ali Rajabzadeh Ghatari, 2021. "Banking System Modeling by Viable System Modeling (VSM)," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 269-290, June.
    17. Blessward JENYA* & Maxwell SANDADA*, 2017. "Enhancing Success of SMES Through Risk Enterprise Management: Evidence From A Developing Country," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 27(2), pages 173-188.
    18. Lawrence R. Cordell & Yilin Huang & Meredith Williams, 2011. "Collateral damage: Sizing and assessing the subprime CDO crisis," Working Papers 11-30, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    19. Yiannis Anagnostopoulos, 2016. "Risk Pricing in Emerging Economies: Credit Scoring and Private Banking in Iran," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 5(1), pages 51-72, January.
    20. Cynthia Clark & Harry Van Buren, 2013. "Compound Conflicts of Interest in the US Proxy System," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 355-371, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    KEYWORD: ROA; CURRENT RATIO; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPANY PERFORMANCE;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:97281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.