IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/71653.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Transition Fiscale Et Regressivite Des Impots Domestiques Indirects En Afrique Sub-Saharienne
[Fiscal Transition System And Indirect Taxes In Sub-Saharan Africa]

Author

Listed:
  • MULENDU, MBUSA

Abstract

Developing countries in general and the Africans ones in particular, have been determined to launch fiscal reforms since the beginning of the 80’s to replace imported fiscal systems by the ones which correspond to their socio-economic context. One of those reforms called fiscal transition is what we talk about in this paper. It consists to substitute domestic taxes to custom and excise duties. The literature shows that most African countries are currently right in the middle of this reform process. The study of this reform needs to take on account the distortive impact on market equilibriums (=efficiency effect) as well as the redistributive impact (=equity effect). In order to do so, this work tries to examine if the fiscal transition policy as it is applied in most African countries, is harmful to the principle of equity in SSA. The fiscal incidence and the optimal tax theories provide us with a reference framework. In addition to that, the partial equilibrium approach based on Mirrlees and Diamond (1971) model shows us that the fiscal transition policy is not harmful to the principle of equity and the indirect domestic taxes are rather progressives than being regressive in SSA.

Suggested Citation

  • Mulendu, Mbusa, 2015. "Transition Fiscale Et Regressivite Des Impots Domestiques Indirects En Afrique Sub-Saharienne [Fiscal Transition System And Indirect Taxes In Sub-Saharan Africa]," MPRA Paper 71653, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2016.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:71653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/71653/1/MPRA_paper_71653.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmad, Ehtisham & Stern, Nicholas, 1984. "The theory of reform and indian indirect taxes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 259-298, December.
    2. Catherine Araujo-Bonjean & Gérard Chambas, 2001. "Le paradoxe de la fiscalité agricole en Afrique subsaharienne," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 42(168), pages 773-788.
    3. Gérard CHAMBAS & Jean-François BRUN & Martial LAURENT, 2007. "Economie politique de la réforme de transition fiscale : le cas du Maroc," Working Papers 200717, CERDI.
    4. Atkinson, A. B. & Stiglitz, J. E., 1976. "The design of tax structure: Direct versus indirect taxation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1-2), pages 55-75.
    5. Diamond, Peter A & Mirrlees, James A, 1971. "Optimal Taxation and Public Production II: Tax Rules," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(3), pages 261-278, June.
    6. Gérard Forgeot & Christophe Starzec, 2003. "L'impact redistributif des impôts indirects en France," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00268929, HAL.
    7. Jean-François Gautier, 2001. "Taxation optimale et réformes fiscales dans les PED : une revue de littérature tropicalisée," Working Papers DT/2001/02, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4750 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Gérard Forgeot & Christophe Starzec, 2003. "L'impact redistributif des impôts indirects en France," Post-Print halshs-00268929, HAL.
    10. Richard Bird & Pierre-Pascal Gendron, 2006. "Is VAT the Best Way to Impose a General Consumption Tax in Developing Countries," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0618, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    11. Baunsgaard, Thomas & Keen, Michael, 2010. "Tax revenue and (or?) trade liberalization," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(9-10), pages 563-577, October.
    12. Gérard Chambas, 2011. "Afrique au Sud du Sahara : quelle stratégie de transition fiscale ?," Working Papers halshs-00564676, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Violeta Vulovic & Yongzheng Liu, 2011. "Direct versus Indirect Taxation: Trends, Theory, and Economic Significance," Chapters, in: Emilio Albi & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez (ed.), The Elgar Guide to Tax Systems, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez, 2012. "Optimal Labor Income Taxation," NBER Working Papers 18521, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Andrej Cupák & Peter Tóth, 2017. "Measuring the Efficiency of VAT reforms: Evidence from Slovakia," Working and Discussion Papers WP 6/2017, Research Department, National Bank of Slovakia.
    4. David Madden & Michael Savage, 2020. "Which households matter most? Capturing equity considerations in tax reform via generalised social marginal welfare weights," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(1), pages 153-193, February.
    5. Céline de Quatrebarbes & Savard Luc & Boccanfuso Dorothée, 2011. "Can the suppression of VAT exemption support the poor? The case of Niger," EcoMod2011 3227, EcoMod.
    6. Stéphane Gauthier & Fanny Henriet, 2015. "Many-Person Ramsey Rule and Nonlinear Income Taxation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 15033, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    7. Gemmell, Norman, 2021. "Economic Lessons for Tax Policy Advisers," Working Paper Series 21109, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    8. Stéphane Gauthier & Fanny Henriet, 2016. "Consumption taxes and taste heterogeneity," Working Papers halshs-01252563, HAL.
    9. Gauthier, Stéphane & Henriet, Fanny, 2018. "Commodity taxes and taste heterogeneity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 284-296.
    10. Sushama Murty, 2019. "Some results from the theory of optimal taxation and their relevance for increasing the progressiveness of Indian tax structure," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 19-50, June.
    11. Michael Smart, 2012. "Departures from Neutrality in Canada's Goods and Services Tax," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 5(5), February.
    12. Abrell, Jan & Rausch, Sebastian & Schwarz, Giacomo A., 2018. "How robust is the uniform emissions pricing rule to social equity concerns?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 783-814.
    13. Gemmell, Norman, 2021. "Economic Lessons for Tax Policy Advisers," Working Paper Series 9463, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    14. Tehmina S. Khan & Mr. John Norregaard, 2007. "Tax Policy: Recent Trends and Coming Challenges," IMF Working Papers 2007/274, International Monetary Fund.
    15. Börjesson, Maria & Asplund, Disa & Hamilton, Carl, 2021. "Optimal kilometre tax for electric passenger cars," Working Papers 2021:3, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    16. Kodjo Adandohoin & Vigninou Gammadigbe, 2022. "The revenue efficiency consequences of the announcement of a tax transition reform: The case of WAEMU countries," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 34(S1), pages 195-218, July.
    17. Åsa Johansson, 2016. "Public Finance, Economic Growth and Inequality: A Survey of the Evidence," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1346, OECD Publishing.
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/56k383m9o9kpb1g6f8rvv74ok is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Timothy Besley & Torsten Persson, 2011. "Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9624.
    20. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2018. "Pareto efficient taxation and expenditures: Pre- and re-distribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 101-119.
    21. Hisahiro Naito, 2003. "Atkinson and Stiglitz Theorem with Endogenous Human Capital Accumulation," ISER Discussion Paper 0596, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Transition fiscal system; indirect taxes; equity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H00 - Public Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:71653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.