IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/22431.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Meritocratic Aspects Concerning Civil Servant Career. Comparative Study In Central and Eastern European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Matei, Ani
  • Popa, Florin

Abstract

Central and Eastern Europe has known in the last 20 years profound changes. The shift from a dictatorial system to a democratic system forced the states from this area to adopt structural measures for all public institutions. In this context, the institution of “civil servant” could not remain unaffected. In the period of communist regimes, the institution of “civil servant” did not exist, the civil servant being just a simple employee of the state. Work relations were the same as for any employee. The shift to another political system, the democratic one, determined the reconsideration the role and the place of public administration, and implicit of civil servant in the framework of the state system. In this context, it has been a shift from the statute of simple employee to that of civil servant, representing the power of the state. In the process of accession to the European Union, the states from Central and Eastern Europe have been permanently pressured to clearly define a strategy concerning the competitiveness of public administration, concerning the statute and the career of civil servant. In the context of democratisation, we can notice that the principle of meritocracy has become a key principle in the civil servant’s career. The term “meritocracy” is often used in order to describe a type of society in which wealth and social position are obtained mainly through competition or through ability or proved competences. A position invested with responsibilities and social prestige has to be acquired and not inherited or obtained by arbitrary criteria. Meritocracy represents also the term used to describe or to criticise a society in competition that accepts inequitable disparities of income, wealth and social position. Taking into account the above considerations, the present paper aims to achieve an analysis of meritocratic aspects in the systems of planning and promotion of civil servant’s career in Central and Eastern Europe

Suggested Citation

  • Matei, Ani & Popa, Florin, 2010. "Meritocratic Aspects Concerning Civil Servant Career. Comparative Study In Central and Eastern European Countries," MPRA Paper 22431, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 May 2010.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:22431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/22431/1/MPRA_paper_22431.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ani Matei & Lucica Matei, 2008. "Statistic instruments for performance evaluation in the public sector. A case study for Romania," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 5(1), pages 35-52, June.
    2. Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica, 2007. "Meritocratic Aspects Concerning Performance Evaluation in the Public Sector - A Case Study for Romania," MPRA Paper 18940, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Dec 2008.
    3. Lucica Matei, 2009. "Romanian Public Management Reform. Theoretical and empirical studies. Volume 2 - Civil service," Economics Books, The Economica Publishing House, edition 1, volume 2, number 02, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matei, Lucica, 2006. "Management of Civil Service Professionalisation in the Knowledge-based Society. Legal and Institutional Framework," MPRA Paper 19997, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Dec 2009.
    2. Tatiana-Camelia DOGARU, 2014. "Contracting Out The Pensions System In Romania," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 91-102, May.
    3. Dogaru, Tatiana-Camelia, 2014. "The Rational Distribution of Public Resources: A Challenge for Public Budgets Reform," MPRA Paper 61093, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Nen Madlena & Nicolescu Cristina & Rădulescu Crina, 2014. "University Promotion – Key Factor Of The Use Of Marketing Strategies, In The Context Of Improving The Romanian Higher Education. Case Study," Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 633-638, August.
    5. Berceanu, Ionut Bogdan & Mititelu, Cristina, 2016. "The Impact of Economic Crisis on the Emerging Administrations from Southeastern Europe. Case Study: Romania," MPRA Paper 100365, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Valentina Cornea, 2018. "The Role Of The Associative Structures Of The Local Authorities In The Governance Process," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 7(1), pages 23-29, May.
    7. Meneguzzo, Marco & Fiorani, Gloria & Mititelu, Cristina & Matei, Lucica & Matei, Ani & Cipolleta, Germano, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union: Trajectories of Reforms in Italy and Romania," MPRA Paper 27780, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Mares Marius Daniel & Mares Valerica, 2010. "Particularities And Tendencies In It," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 1196-1201, December.
    9. Cristea, Ana Ionela, 2016. "Las dimensiones de la descentralización en el espacio administrativo rumano [The dimensions of decentralization in the Romanian Administrative Space]," MPRA Paper 70105, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Meritocracy; IQ; Civil service; Central and Eastern States; Weberiannes Scale; Empirical Studies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:22431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.