IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/122419.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring the Resilience of Urban Green Infrastructure: A Comparative Assessment of Resilience in Bangkok Metro Forest Project and The National Garden, Athens

Author

Listed:
  • Thapa, Manish
  • Jebin, Sharmin
  • Ababil, Saify

Abstract

Urban green infrastructure, such as parks and reforestation programs, is critical for building municipal resilience to environmental, social, and economic concerns. The Metro Forest Project in Bangkok shows this by converting an abandoned site into a thriving biological forest utilizing the Miyawaki technique. The PTT Reforestation and Ecology Institute began this initiative, which focuses on using native species to reproduce past landscapes, enhancing biodiversity and ecological resilience. Despite its success, the initiative faces obstacles such as climate change effects, air and water pollution, and obtaining long-term finance. The study's goal is to assess the project's resilience by comparing it to the National Garden of Athens, identifying strengths, flaws, and areas for improvement. The study used diverse research methodologies, including qualitative and quantitative approaches, to examine the resilience of the Metro Forest Project and the National Garden of Athens. Data were gathered from both secondary and primary sources, including literature studies, field trips, and key informant interviews. The data was examined using a contextualized city resilience paradigm that considered social, environmental, economic, and institutional components. This thorough approach gave a full picture of the resilience status of both urban green areas, allowing for a comparative analysis that yielded valuable insights. According to the study, the Metro Forest Project successfully boosted urban biodiversity and resilience through innovative design and community engagement. Due to the limitation of this study, the resilience for sitting in the perspective of a broad urban fabric could not be identified. Some ongoing obstacles have been identified including the need for consistent funding, active community participation, and intensive data gathering to monitor environmental changes. To improve the project's resilience, recommendations include creating a strong data collection system, increasing community participation, improving institutional backing, and performing frequent resilience evaluations. By tackling these issues and using its strengths, the Metro Forest Project can make a substantial contribution to Bangkok's overall resilience programs, supporting a sustainable and livable city environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Thapa, Manish & Jebin, Sharmin & Ababil, Saify, 2024. "Exploring the Resilience of Urban Green Infrastructure: A Comparative Assessment of Resilience in Bangkok Metro Forest Project and The National Garden, Athens," MPRA Paper 122419, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Jul 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:122419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/122419/1/MPRA_paper_122419.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Beilin & Cathy Wilkinson, 2015. "Introduction: Governing for urban resilience," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(7), pages 1205-1217, May.
    2. McPhearson, Timon & Kremer, Peleg & Hamstead, Zoé A., 2013. "Mapping ecosystem services in New York City: Applying a social–ecological approach in urban vacant land," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 11-26.
    3. Berfin KARABAKAN & Yelda MERT, 2021. "Measuring the Green Infrastructure Resilience in Turkey," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Yang Yang & Zhifang Wang & Guangsi Lin, 2021. "Performance Assessment Indicators for Comparing Recreational Services of Urban Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Angeliki Paraskevopoulou & Andreas Klados & Chrysovalantis Malesios, 2020. "Historical Public Parks: Investigating Contemporary Visitor Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhilin Liu & Sainan Lin & Tingting Lu & Yue Shen & Sisi Liang, 2023. "Towards a constructed order of co-governance: Understanding the state–society dynamics of neighbourhood collaborative responses to COVID-19 in urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(9), pages 1730-1749, July.
    2. Jorge Salas & Víctor Yepes, 2020. "Enhancing Sustainability and Resilience through Multi-Level Infrastructure Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    3. De Valck, Jeremy & Beames, Alistair & Liekens, Inge & Bettens, Maarten & Seuntjens, Piet & Broekx, Steven, 2019. "Valuing urban ecosystem services in sustainable brownfield redevelopment," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 139-149.
    4. Melissa R. McHale & Steward T.A. Pickett & Olga Barbosa & David N. Bunn & Mary L. Cadenasso & Daniel L. Childers & Meredith Gartin & George R. Hess & David M. Iwaniec & Timon McPhearson & M. Nils Pete, 2015. "The New Global Urban Realm: Complex, Connected, Diffuse, and Diverse Social-Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, April.
    5. Andersson, Erik & McPhearson, Timon & Kremer, Peleg & Gomez-Baggethun, Erik & Haase, Dagmar & Tuvendal, Magnus & Wurster, Daniel, 2015. "Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 157-164.
    6. Hui Zou & Xuejun Duan & Lei Ye & Lei Wang, 2017. "Locating Sustainability Issues: Identification of Ecological Vulnerability in Mainland China’s Mega-Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Lorenzo Chelleri & Harn Wei Kua & Juan Pablo Rodríguez Sánchez & Kh Md Nahiduzzaman & Gladman Thondhlana, 2016. "Are People Responsive to a More Sustainable, Decentralized, and User-Driven Management of Urban Metabolism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Jules Muvuna & Tuleen Boutaleb & Slobodan B. Mickovski & Keith Baker & Ghoreyshi Seyed Mohammad & Mario Cools & Wissal Selmi, 2020. "Information Integration in a Smart City System—A Case Study on Air Pollution Removal by Green Infrastructure through a Vehicle Smart Routing System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Peihao Song & Gunwoo Kim & Audrey Mayer & Ruizhen He & Guohang Tian, 2020. "Assessing the Ecosystem Services of Various Types of Urban Green Spaces Based on i-Tree Eco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Andersson, Erik & Tengö, Maria & McPhearson, Timon & Kremer, Peleg, 2015. "Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 165-168.
    11. Robert Goodspeed & Ruoshui Liu & Dimitrios Gounaridis & Camilla Lizundia & Joshua Newell, 2022. "A regional spatial planning model for multifunctional green infrastructure," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 815-833, March.
    12. Maria Kaika & Angelos Varvarousis & Federico Demaria & Hug March, 2023. "Urbanizing degrowth: Five steps towards a Radical Spatial Degrowth Agenda for planning in the face of climate emergency," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(7), pages 1191-1211, May.
    13. Ayyoob Sharifi & Lorenzo Chelleri & Cate Fox-Lent & Stelios Grafakos & Minal Pathak & Marta Olazabal & Susie Moloney & Lily Yumagulova & Yoshiki Yamagata, 2017. "Conceptualizing Dimensions and Characteristics of Urban Resilience: Insights from a Co-Design Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Kathrin Specht & Jan Vávra & Martina Artmann & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2020. "Ecosystem Services of Urban Agriculture: Perceptions of Project Leaders, Stakeholders and the General Public," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Diganta Das & Tracey Skelton, 2020. "Hydrating Hyderabad: Rapid urbanisation, water scarcity and the difficulties and possibilities of human flourishing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(7), pages 1553-1569, May.
    16. Häyhä, Tiina & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2014. "Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 124-132.
    17. Karsten Grunewald & Olaf Bastian ., 2017. "Special Issue: “Maintaining Ecosystem Services to Support Urban Needs”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-9, September.
    18. Hansen, Rieke & Frantzeskaki, Niki & McPhearson, Timon & Rall, Emily & Kabisch, Nadja & Kaczorowska, Anna & Kain, Jaan-Henrik & Artmann, Martina & Pauleit, Stephan, 2015. "The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 228-246.
    19. Sebastian Fastenrath & Lars Coenen & Kathryn Davidson, 2019. "Urban Resilience in Action: the Resilient Melbourne Strategy as Transformative Urban Innovation Policy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-10, January.
    20. Xun Zeng & Yuanchun Yu & San Yang & Yang Lv & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker, 2022. "Urban Resilience for Urban Sustainability: Concepts, Dimensions, and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Urban Resilience; Green Infrastructure; Public Space; Eco-Friendly Space;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • R0 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:122419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.