IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/121040.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic Rationale of United States v. Google

Author

Listed:
  • Bet, German
  • Blair, Roger
  • Donna, Javier

Abstract

In 2020, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed an antitrust suit against Google alleging that Google has unlawfully monopolized the markets for general search services, search advertising, and general search text advertising. The complaint raises questions involving market definition, monopoly power, and monopolizing conduct. In this article, we examine these issues through the lens of microeconomic principles. Our analysis finds that there is a sound economic rationale for the DOJ’s complaint.

Suggested Citation

  • Bet, German & Blair, Roger & Donna, Javier, 2022. "The Economic Rationale of United States v. Google," MPRA Paper 121040, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/121040/1/MPRA_paper_121040.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donna, Javier D. & Pereira, Pedro & Trindade, Andre & Yoshida, Renan C., 2020. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales by Manufacturers and Bargaining," MPRA Paper 105773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Monopolization; Google; Antitrust; Search Services; Search Advertising;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • K1 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law
      • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
      • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
      • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
      • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.