IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pil/wpaper/10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Avaliação de Empresas de Pequeno Porte no Brasil através da Metodologia Construtivista de Apoio à Decisão MCDA-C

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus Vinicius Andrade Lima

    (UNISUL Business School)

  • Leonardo Ensslin

    (UNISUL Business School)

  • Ana Lucia de Miranda Lopes

    (UNISUL Business School)

  • Ademar Dutra

    (UNISUL Business School)

Abstract

Esta pesquisa apresenta um método que, sob a ótica construtivista, permite construir modelos para avaliar empresas de pequeno porte no Brasil, com base nas percepções e juízos de valor do investidor. Para tanto, este trabalho se propôs a utilizar uma metodologia multicritério de apoio a decisão construtivista (MCDA-Construtivista), que permitiu operacionalizar o método aqui proposto, a fim de melhor refletir o valor das empresas como negócio. Sob o ponto de vista das escolhas metodológicas de pesquisa, o autor procurou se posicionar diante das diversas correntes teóricas da área de avaliação de empresas; em especial a visão construtivista no processo de apoio a decisão onde se assume a idéia de que resolver um problema é um processo evolutivo de aprendizado. O modelo proposto identifica as variáveis consideradas relevantes pelo decisor em um processo de avaliação de empresa . Utiliza-se de um estudo de caso em uma empresa de pequeno porte (Alfa Tecnoquímica Ltda) para exemplificar a aplicação do modelo construtivista proposto. Concluiu-se que o mais importante do que propor uma metodologia para avaliação é o reconhecimento de que com a abordagem construtivista os envolvidos no processo interagem e aprendem sobre o problema e o que realmente importa são os aspectos julgados relevantes pelo investidor.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Vinicius Andrade Lima & Leonardo Ensslin & Ana Lucia de Miranda Lopes & Ademar Dutra, 2008. "Avaliação de Empresas de Pequeno Porte no Brasil através da Metodologia Construtivista de Apoio à Decisão MCDA-C," Working Papers 10, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.
  • Handle: RePEc:pil:wpaper:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://globadvantage.ipleiria.pt/files/2008/04/working_paper-10_globadvantage.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volume 22 Number 3, 1993. "The Value of Flexibility: The Case of a Dual-Fuel Industrial Steam Boiler," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 22(3), Fall.
    2. Roy, Bernard, 1993. "Decision science or decision-aid science?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 184-203, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sébastien Damart, 2010. "A Cognitive Mapping Approach to Organizing the Participation of Multiple Actors in a Problem Structuring Process," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 505-526, September.
    2. Oliva, Rogelio, 2003. "Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 552-568, December.
    3. Julie Ryschawy & Rodolphe Sabatier & Dominique Vollet, 2016. "Comment sont évalués les systèmes et filières d’élevage. Un focus sur les méthodes et outils. Chapitre 3," Post-Print hal-02799411, HAL.
    4. Tsoukias, Alexis, 2008. "From decision theory to decision aiding methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 138-161, May.
    5. Maria Franca Norese & Diana Rolando & Rocco Curto, 2023. "DIKEDOC: a multicriteria methodology to organise and communicate knowledge," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1049-1082, June.
    6. Nikolaos Argyris & Alec Morton & José Rui Figueira, 2014. "CUT: A Multicriteria Approach for Concavifiable Preferences," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 633-642, June.
    7. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    8. Greco, Salvatore, 1997. "A new PCCA method: IDRA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 587-601, May.
    9. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    10. Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2007. "On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 3-27, October.
    11. Moreno-Jiménez, José María & Polasek, Wolfgang, 2003. "E-Democracy and Knowledge. A Multicriteria Framework for the New Democratic Era," Economics Series 142, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    12. Jack R. Meredith, 2001. "Reconsidering the Philosophical Basis of OR/MS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 325-333, June.
    13. Salvatore Corrente & Salvatore Greco & Roman Słowiński, 2017. "Handling imprecise evaluations in multiple criteria decision aiding and robust ordinal regression by n-point intervals," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 127-157, June.
    14. Marta Bottero & Elena Comino & Federico Dell’Anna & Laura Dominici & Maurizio Rosso, 2019. "Strategic Assessment and Economic Evaluation: The Case Study of Yanzhou Island (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Peter-Jan Engelen, 2004. "Criminal Behavior: A Real Option Approach With an Application to Restricting Illegal Insider Trading," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 329-352, May.
    16. JosÉ MarÍa & Moreno JimÉnez & Juan AguarÓn Joven & AgustÍn Raluy Pirla & Alberto TurÓn Lanuza, 2005. "A Spreadsheet Module for Consistent Consensus Building in AHP-Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 89-108, March.
    17. Silvia Angilella & Sebastiano Mazz`u, 2013. "The Financing of Innovative SMEs: a multicriteria credit rating model," Papers 1308.0889, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2014.
    18. Jaqueline Marcis & Sandro Cesar Bortoluzzi & Edson Pinheiro Lima & Sérgio Eduardo Gouvêa Costa, 2019. "Sustainability performance evaluation of agricultural cooperatives’ operations: a systemic review of the literature," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1111-1126, June.
    19. Almeida-Dias, J. & Figueira, J.R. & Roy, B., 2010. "Electre Tri-C: A multiple criteria sorting method based on characteristic reference actions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 565-580, August.
    20. Fernando García & Jairo González-Bueno & Francisco Guijarro & Javier Oliver, 2020. "Forecasting the Environmental, Social, and Governance Rating of Firms by Using Corporate Financial Performance Variables: A Rough Set Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Avaliação de empresas; Firms' evaluation; MCDS-C;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • G0 - Financial Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pil:wpaper:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nuno Reis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiplpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.