IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pid/rrepot/20244.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Political Party Manifestos: Reform Paradox in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • PIDE

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad)

Abstract

A precise manifesto serves as a yardstick to measure performance of political parties against pledges. However, the culture of meaningful debates remains elusive in Pakistan’s politics. Manifestos presented by the political parties in 2024 General elections reflect a wish-list having tall claims but no strategy of resource mobilization, and making the economy self-driven without the IMF borrowing.

Suggested Citation

  • Pide, 2024. "Political Party Manifestos: Reform Paradox in Pakistan," PIDE Research Report 2024:4, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:rrepot:2024:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://file.pide.org.pk/pdfpideresearch/rr-political-party-manifestos-reform-paradox-in-pakistan.pdf
    File Function: First Version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadeem Ul Haque & David Orden, 2020. "Developing Research and a Research Culture: Results from a Pilot Project in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 553-570.
    2. Abbas Murtaza Maken & Izzah Salam, 2023. "Digital Dialogues vs Paper Promises: Manifesto Alignment," PIDE Knowledge Brief 2023:106, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    3. repec:pid:kbrief:2023:107 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shujaat Farooq & Azwar Muhammad Aslam & Nadeem Ul Haque, 2024. "Political Party Manifestos Reform Paradox in Pakistan," PIDE Research Report 2024:16, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:rrepot:2024:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.