IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/thesis/dn24t_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi-actor Challenges for Development and Implementation of Sustainable Mobility in Rural Areas in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Wierenga, Synthia Winnie Maria

Abstract

The transition to sustainable transportation is challenging for governments, transport operators and travellers (Liu, Yu, Trisha, & Beimborn, 2020). In this research, the challenges for development and implementation of sustainable mobility have been researched from a multi-actor perspective for the rural area. This thesis's overall research objective is: to identify the challenges and opportunities of the transition towards sustainable mobility in Dutch rural areas from a multi-actor perspective. The study area of this research is the Achterhoek. Multiple methods are used to conduct this research. A literature study was conducted into travel behaviour, sustainable transport, rural mobility, and multiple actors' role in the transition of sustainable mobility. Subsequently, an analysis was carried out of OViN and ODiN data (Onderzoek Verplaatsingen in Nederland, CBS) in which travel behaviour, motives and transport choices were presented. Besides, a survey was conducted among respondents living in the Achterhoek (N = 399). A policy analysis at the national, provincial, and regional level has been carried out concerning (sustainable) transport and mobility to gain insight into the government’s and transport operator's perspective. In-depth interviews were held with various actors in the area: the province, municipality, 8RHK (semi-government), entrepreneurs and transport operators. With a cooperative structure, actors aim at realising sustainable mobility. However, current policies focus on the provision of sustainable transportation instead of focusing on sustainable mobility, without a complete understanding of the needs, opportunities, and abilities of the travellers and the actors' goals. This is an important finding in understanding the challenges regarding developing and implementing sustainable mobility in rural areas. Therefore, for establishing sustainable mobility, an approach that emphasized changing travel behaviour for specific traveller groups will be more successful (Ahmed et al., 2020; Hamidi & Zhao, 2020; Zhang & Van Acker, 2017). From this research it can be concluded that the current travel behaviour of the people in the Achterhoek is not very sustainable. Dominant car use, little use of public transportation and indispensability of cars according to respondents will be a challenge for governments and operators when it comes to implementation of sustainable mobility. Travellers do not play a big role in most of the policies of governments and transport operators. However, as mobility is all about someone’s ability to travel from origin to destination with a certain travel mode, the travellers should also have a place in the whole transition towards sustainable mobility. Therefore, the biggest challenge is to change the travellers travel behaviour into sustainable travel behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Wierenga, Synthia Winnie Maria, 2021. "Multi-actor Challenges for Development and Implementation of Sustainable Mobility in Rural Areas in the Netherlands," Thesis Commons dn24t_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:dn24t_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/dn24t_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/605dbdf4229503008e6eab57/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/dn24t_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Le Vine & John Polak, 2015. "Introduction to special issue: new directions in shared-mobility research," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 407-411, May.
    2. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam & Zohdy, Ismail & Kock, Beaudry, 2016. "Shared Mobility: Current Practices and Guiding Principles Brief," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0gz3b3fx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Junmin & Kim, Keungoui & Kim, Jiyong & Hwang, Junseok, 2022. "The relationship between shared mobility and regulation in South Korea: A system dynamics approach from the socio-technical transitions perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Yue Wang & Yuanfang Zhu & Chunyi Wei & Meilan Jiang & Toshiyuki Yamamoto, 2024. "Carsharing Worldwide: Case Studies on Carsharing Development in China, Europe, Japan, and the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Abouelela, Mohamed & Durán-Rodas, David & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2024. "Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Fangqing Song & Stephane Hess & Thijs Dekker, 2024. "Uncovering the link between intra-individual heterogeneity and variety seeking: the case of new shared mobility," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 371-406, April.
    5. Wierenga, Synthia Winnie Maria, 2021. "Multi-actor Challenges for Development and Implementation of Sustainable Mobility in Rural Areas in the Netherlands," Thesis Commons dn24t, Center for Open Science.
    6. Du, Mingyang & Cheng, Lin & Li, Xuefeng & Liu, Qiyang & Yang, Jingzong, 2022. "Spatial variation of ridesplitting adoption rate in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 13-37.
    7. Fan, Rong & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff), 2022. "Commuting service platform: Concept and analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 18-51.
    8. Gonzalo Fernandez-Sanchez & Alvaro Fernandez-Heredia, 2018. "Strategic Thinking for Sustainability: A Review of 10 Strategies for Sustainable Mobility by Bus for Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Xingguang Chen & Hepu Deng & Shuqi Guan & Faxing Han & Zihuan Zhu, 2024. "Cooperation-Oriented Multi-Modal Shared Mobility for Sustainable Transport: Developments and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Zhang, Si & Sun, Huijun & Wang, Xu & Lv, Ying & Wu, Jianjun, 2022. "Optimization of personalized price discounting scheme for one-way station-based carsharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 220-238.
    11. Papaix, Claire & Eranova, Mariya & Zhou, Li, 2023. "Shared mobility research: Looking through a paradox lens," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 156-167.
    12. Faissal Jelti & Amine Allouhi & Kheira Anissa Tabet Aoul, 2023. "Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Xiao, Lin & Wu, Jiyan & Sun, Jian & Tian, Ye, 2024. "Money is power: Carpooling stimulus with evidence from an interactive long-term laboratory experiment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 55-70.
    14. Wang, Yiyuan & Shen, Qing, 2023. "An economic analysis of incorporating new shared mobility into public transportation provision," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 263-273.
    15. Shulika, Olha & Bujak, Michal & Ghasemi, Farnoud & Kucharski, Rafal, 2024. "Spatiotemporal variability of ride-pooling potential – Half a year New York City experiment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Clewlow, Regina R. & Mishra, Gouri S., 2017. "Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt82w2z91j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Zilong Zhao & Mengyuan Fang & Luliang Tang & Xue Yang & Zihan Kan & Qingquan Li, 2022. "The Impact of Community Shuttle Services on Traffic and Traffic-Related Air Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Zhang, Xin & Zhong, Shiquan & Ling, Shuai & Jia, Ning & Qi, Hang & He, Zhengbing, 2022. "How to promote the transition from solo driving to mobility services delivery? An empirical study focusing on ridesharing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 176-187.
    19. Namazu, Michiko & MacKenzie, Don & Zerriffi, Hisham & Dowlatabadi, Hadi, 2018. "Is carsharing for everyone? Understanding the diffusion of carsharing services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 189-199.
    20. Giller, James & Compostella, Junia & Iogansen, Xiatian & Young, Mischa & Circella, Giovanni, 2024. "Barriers to Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Transportation Part 1: Support to the Clean Miles Standard Policy Making," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1x6982gf, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:dn24t_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thesiscommons.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.