IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/ztgdq.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does sanctioning disabled claimants of unemployment insurance increase labour market inactivity? An analysis of 346 British local authorities between 2009 and 2014

Author

Listed:
  • Reeves, Aaron

    (London School of Economics and Political Science)

Abstract

Imposing financial penalties on claimants of unemployment insurance may incentivise labour market re-entry. However, sanctions may have differential effects depending on the work-readiness of the claimants. Here, I explore whether sanctioning disabled claimants is associated with greater labour market activity or inactivity among disabled people using data on 346 British local authorities between 2009 and 2014. When the number of sanctioned disabled claimants rises (as a proportion of all claimants) the proportion of economically inactive people who are also disabled becomes larger. There is not a clear relationship between sanctioning disabled claimants the proportion of employed people who are disabled.

Suggested Citation

  • Reeves, Aaron, 2017. "Does sanctioning disabled claimants of unemployment insurance increase labour market inactivity? An analysis of 346 British local authorities between 2009 and 2014," SocArXiv ztgdq, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ztgdq
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ztgdq
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/59625dbd594d90022882b976/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ztgdq?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Taulbut & Daniel F Mackay & Gerry McCartney, 2018. "Job Seeker’s Allowance (JSA) benefit sanctions and labour market outcomes in Britain, 2001–2014," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(5), pages 1417-1434.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ztgdq. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.