IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/r8ygd.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Cybercrime and Cyberdeviance in Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Buil-Gil, David

    (University of Manchester)

  • Trajtenberg, Nicolas
  • Aebi, Marcelo F.

Abstract

Cybercrime is on the rise, and so is the need to systematically analyze its prevalence, distribution, causes, and consequences. While official records (mainly police, prosecution and court statistics) provide important information to explore online crime, they have been subject to extensive criticism due to the presence of measurement error arising from the combined influences of victims’ underreporting and recording practices. Consequently, researchers, crime analysts and policy makers are increasingly relying on estimates of cybercrime and cyberdeviance based on surveys. This chapter reviews the measures of cybercrime and cyberdeviance included in national crime surveys, including household and business victimization surveys and self-report offending surveys. The chapter describes, categorizes and compares measures included in surveys, and discusses opportunities and limitations to generate reliable and valid estimates to study cybercrime and cyberdeviance. Measures included in surveys do not capture the diversity of criminal and deviant behaviors that take place online, and some surveys only probe about certain frauds that may take place both on and offline. The chapter identifies opportunities for researchers to utilize existing data to advance our understanding of online victimization and offending, and provides methodological recommendations to improve the recording of cybercrime and cyberdeviance in existing surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Buil-Gil, David & Trajtenberg, Nicolas & Aebi, Marcelo F., 2023. "Measuring Cybercrime and Cyberdeviance in Surveys," SocArXiv r8ygd, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:r8ygd
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/r8ygd
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63e01d3f2781fc065c00b3f6/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/r8ygd?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byung H. Lee, 2018. "Explaining Cyber Deviance among School-Aged Youth," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(2), pages 563-584, April.
    2. Skogan, Wesley G., 1975. "Measurement problems in official and survey crime rates," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 17-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verma, Arvind, 1998. "The fractal dimension of policing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 425-435, September.
    2. Steven C. Hertler, 2015. "Toward a Biology of Collectivism," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    3. Nicolò Barbieri & Ugo Rizzo, 2023. "The impact of crime on firm entry," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 446-469, March.
    4. Monika Verbalyte & Christoph Keitel & Krista Howard, 2022. "Online Trolls: Unaffectionate Psychopaths or Just Lonely Outcasts and Angry Partisans?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 396-410.
    5. Nolan III, James J., 2004. "Establishing the statistical relationship between population size and UCR crime rate: Its impact and implications," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 547-555.
    6. Chen, Ji-Kang & Chang, Ching-Wen & Wang, Zhiyou & Wang, Li-Chih & Wei, Hsi-Sheng, 2021. "Cyber deviance among adolescents in Taiwan: Prevalence and correlates," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:r8ygd. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.