IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/mwhnb_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Administration by Algorithm? Public Management meets Public Sector Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Veale, Michael

    (University College London)

  • Brass, Irina

Abstract

Public bodies and agencies increasingly seek to use new forms of data analysis in order to provide 'better public services'. These reforms have consisted of digital service transformations generally aimed at 'improving the experience of the citizen', 'making government more efficient' and 'boosting business and the wider economy'. More recently however, there has been a push to use administrative data to build algorithmic models, often using machine learning, to help make day-to-day operational decisions in the management and delivery of public services rather than providing general policy evidence. This chapter asks several questions relating to this. What are the drivers of these new approaches? Is public sector machine learning a smooth continuation of e-Government, or does it pose fundamentally different challenge to practices of public administration? And how are public management decisions and practices at different levels enacted when machine learning solutions are implemented in the public sector? Focussing on different levels of government: the macro, the meso, and the 'street-level', we map out and analyse the current efforts to frame and standardise machine learning in the public sector, noting that they raise several concerns around the skills, capacities, processes and practices governments currently employ. The forms of these are likely to have value-laden, political consequences worthy of significant scholarly attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Veale, Michael & Brass, Irina, 2019. "Administration by Algorithm? Public Management meets Public Sector Machine Learning," SocArXiv mwhnb_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mwhnb_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mwhnb_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5cbb2a3af2be3c001805c24c/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/mwhnb_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:elg:eebook:14251 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rachel Courtland, 2018. "Bias detectives: the researchers striving to make algorithms fair," Nature, Nature, vol. 558(7710), pages 357-360, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fellnhofer, Katharina & Sornette, Didier, 2022. "Embracing The Intuitive-Analytical Paradox? How Intuitive And Analytical Decision-Making Drive Paradoxes In Simple And Complex Environments," OSF Preprints evjd6, Center for Open Science.
    2. Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia & Nascimento, Susana & Pólvora, Alexandre, 2020. "Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence: Critical notes on European policy frameworks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    3. Fellnhofer, Katharina & Sornette, Didier, 2022. "Embracing the intuitive-analytical paradox? How intuitive and analytical decision-making drive paradoxes in simple and complex environments," OSF Preprints evjd6_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Scott Thiebes & Sebastian Lins & Ali Sunyaev, 2021. "Trustworthy artificial intelligence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 447-464, June.
    5. Dessislava Pachamanova & Vera Tilson & Keely Dwyer-Matzky, 2022. "Case Article—Machine Learning, Ethics, and Change Management: A Data-Driven Approach to Improving Hospital Observation Unit Operations," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 178-187, May.
    6. Emma Dahlin, 2021. "Mind the gap! On the future of AI research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-4, December.
    7. Dario Onorati & Pierfrancesco Tommasino & Leonardo Ranaldi & Francesca Fallucchi & Fabio Massimo Zanzotto, 2020. "Pat-in-the-Loop : Declarative Knowledge for Controlling Neural Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Muhammad Tanveer & Shafiqul Hassan & Amiya Bhaumik, 2020. "Academic Policy Regarding Sustainability and Artificial Intelligence (AI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Sanaz Honarmand Ebrahimi & Marinus Ossewaarde & Ariana Need, 2021. "Smart Fishery: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda for Sustainable Fisheries in the Age of AI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Michael Färber & Melissa Coutinho & Shuzhou Yuan, 2023. "Biases in scholarly recommender systems: impact, prevalence, and mitigation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2703-2736, May.
    11. David Rozado, 2020. "Wide range screening of algorithmic bias in word embedding models using large sentiment lexicons reveals underreported bias types," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Veale, Michael & Brass, Irina, 2019. "Administration by Algorithm? Public Management meets Public Sector Machine Learning," SocArXiv mwhnb, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mwhnb_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.