IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/mb2vp_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business models, consumer experiences and regulation of retirement villages

Author

Listed:
  • Travers, Max
  • Liu, Edgar
  • Cook, Peta
  • Osborne, Caroline
  • Jacobs, Keith
  • Aminpour, Fatemeh
  • Dwyer, Zack

Abstract

This research looks at the appeal, benefits and disadvantages of living in retirement villages, as well as at the business models employed and how the Australian Government can help the sector to expand. Retirement villages are a fast-growing housing sector: in 2014 approximately 184,000 Australians lived in retirement villages, equivalent to 5.7 per cent of the population aged 65 and over, a rate projected to increase to 7.5 per cent by 2025. Living in retirement villages saves the health care system $2.16 billion, with $1.98 billion of those savings achieved by postponing residents’ entry into government funded aged care facilities; however the sector does not currently receive direct funding from Commonwealth or state and territory governments. Retirement villages are governed by state and territory legislation in Australia, with each jurisdiction enacting its own set of regulations. A state tribunal in each jurisdiction provides independent, low cost and accessible dispute resolution in consumer or tenancy disputes. The major providers active in the retirement village industry are for-profit companies who market their product as a ‘lifestyle choice’ to entice wealthy Australians to purchase accommodation. There is little prospect that small not-for-profit organisations will expand their retirement provision without significant government funding (in the form of tax breaks, subsidies etc.). This research makes a number of recommendations, including a national ombudsman to support and advocate for the rights of older people navigating disputes with retirement village operators; greater transparency into fees and ongoing charges for retirement village residents; and building standards that ensure retirement village operators are responsible for providing accessible, universally designed residences and facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Travers, Max & Liu, Edgar & Cook, Peta & Osborne, Caroline & Jacobs, Keith & Aminpour, Fatemeh & Dwyer, Zack, 2022. "Business models, consumer experiences and regulation of retirement villages," SocArXiv mb2vp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mb2vp_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mb2vp_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63994fd9e4687409b79b413c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/mb2vp_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J Stimson & Rod McCrea, 2004. "A Push – Pull Framework for Modelling the Relocation of Retirees to a Retirement Village: The Australian Experience," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(8), pages 1451-1470, August.
    2. Beth Turnbull & Melissa L Graham & Ann R Taket, 2016. "Social Exclusion of Australian Childless Women in Their Reproductive Years," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 102-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Travers, Max & Liu, Edgar & Cook, Peta & Osborne, Caroline & Jacobs, Keith & Aminpour, Fatemeh & Dwyer, Zack, 2022. "Business models, consumer experiences and regulation of retirement villages," SocArXiv mb2vp, Center for Open Science.
    2. Mengni Chen & Stuart Gietel-Basten & Paul S. F. Yip, 2020. "Targeting and Mistargeting of Family Policies in High-Income Pacific Asian Societies: A Review of Financial Incentives," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(3), pages 389-413, June.
    3. Vij, Akshay & Ardeshiri, Ali & Li, Tiebei & Beer, Andrew & Crommelin, Laura, 2022. "Understanding what attracts new residents to smaller cities," SocArXiv fpxum_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Fu, Jen-Ruei, 2011. "Understanding career commitment of IT professionals: Perspectives of push–pull–mooring framework and investment model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 279-293.
    5. Vera L. Buijs & Bertus F. Jeronimus & Gerine M. A. Lodder & Nardi Steverink & Peter Jonge, 2021. "Social Needs and Happiness: A Life Course Perspective," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1953-1978, April.
    6. Veronika Paksi & Beáta Nagy & Katalin Tardos, 2022. "Perceptions of Barriers to Motherhood: Female STEM PhD Students’ Changing Family Plans," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 149-159.
    7. Julia Sauter & Iuliana Precupetu & Marja Aartsen, 2024. "Cohort and gender differences in the association between childlessness and social exclusion in old age," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Jiaxuan E & Bo Xia & Laurie Buys & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Development for Older Australians: Understanding the Formation of Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities in the Greater Brisbane Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Florianne C. J. Verkroost, 2022. "A Bayesian multivariate hierarchical growth curve model to examine cumulative socio‐economic (dis)advantage among childless adults and parents," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2234-2276, October.
    10. Meera Suresh Babu, 2024. "‘Are You a Real Woman?’: Stigma and the Childfree Indian Woman," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 31(3), pages 287-307, October.
    11. Beth Turnbull & Ann Taket & Melissa Graham, 2023. "Multilevel Continua of Mothers, Fathers and Childless Women and Men’s Work–Life “Choices” and Their Constraints, Enablers and Consequences," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-35, March.
    12. Vij, Akshay & Ardeshiri, Ali & Li, Tiebei & Beer, Andrew & Crommelin, Laura, 2022. "Understanding what attracts new residents to smaller cities," SocArXiv fpxum, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mb2vp_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.