IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/h63mz_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Computational Complexity of Nash Equilibria

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenbaum, Janet

Abstract

Although the computation of Nash equlibria for general games is of unknown complexity, there exist many algorithms for specific game classes, some of which are a marked improvement of previous algorithms. This paper reviews general results on the computational complexity of Nash equilibria and discusses the major algorithms for specific game classes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenbaum, Janet, 2002. "The Computational Complexity of Nash Equilibria," SocArXiv h63mz_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:h63mz_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/h63mz_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5cce29b378c993001dd38554/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/h63mz_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koller, Daphne & Megiddo, Nimrod & von Stengel, Bernhard, 1996. "Efficient Computation of Equilibria for Extensive Two-Person Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 247-259, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sung, Shao-Chin & Dimitrov, Dinko, 2010. "Computational complexity in additive hedonic games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 635-639, June.
    2. Bernhard von Stengel & Antoon van den Elzen & Dolf Talman, 2002. "Computing Normal Form Perfect Equilibria for Extensive Two-Person Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 693-715, March.
    3. Pahl, Lucas, 2023. "Polytope-form games and index/degree theories for extensive-form games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 444-471.
    4. Richard Baron & Jacques Durieu & Hans Haller & Rahul Savani & Philippe Solal, 2008. "Good neighbors are hard to find: computational complexity of network formation," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Srihari Govindan & Robert Wilson, 2008. "Metastable Equilibria," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 787-820, November.
    6. Rajgopal Kannan & Sudipta Sarangi & S. S. Iyengar, 2002. "Strategic Path Reliability in Information Networks," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 298, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Rosenbaum, Janet, 2002. "The Computational Complexity of Nash Equilibria," SocArXiv h63mz, Center for Open Science.
    8. Samid Hoda & Andrew Gilpin & Javier Peña & Tuomas Sandholm, 2010. "Smoothing Techniques for Computing Nash Equilibria of Sequential Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 494-512, May.
    9. P. Herings & Ronald Peeters, 2010. "Homotopy methods to compute equilibria in game theory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 42(1), pages 119-156, January.
    10. Stuart McDonald & Liam Wagner, 2010. "The Computation of Perfect and Proper Equilibrium for Finite Games via Simulated Annealing," Risk & Uncertainty Working Papers WPR10_1, Risk and Sustainable Management Group, University of Queensland, revised Apr 2010.
    11. Etessami, Kousha, 2021. "The complexity of computing a (quasi-)perfect equilibrium for an n-player extensive form game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 107-140.
    12. Bernhard von Stengel & Françoise Forges, 2008. "Extensive-Form Correlated Equilibrium: Definition and Computational Complexity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1002-1022, November.
    13. Papadimitriou, Christos, 2015. "The Complexity of Computing Equilibria," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    14. Benoit Duvocelle & János Flesch & Hui Min Shi & Dries Vermeulen, 2021. "Search for a moving target in a competitive environment," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(2), pages 547-557, June.
    15. F. Forges & B. von Stengel, 2002. "Computionally Efficient Coordination in Games Trees," THEMA Working Papers 2002-05, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    16. Corine M. Laan & Ana Isabel Barros & Richard J. Boucherie & Herman Monsuur & Judith Timmer, 2019. "Solving partially observable agent‐intruder games with an application to border security problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(2), pages 174-190, March.
    17. Peter Godfrey-Smith & Manolo Martínez, 2013. "Communication and Common Interest," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-6, November.
    18. Theodore Turocy, 2010. "Computing sequential equilibria using agent quantal response equilibria," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 42(1), pages 255-269, January.
    19. Stuart McDonald & Liam Wagner, 2013. "A Stochastic Search Algorithm for the Computation of Perfect and Proper Equilibria," Discussion Papers Series 480, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    20. Peter Miltersen & Troels Sørensen, 2010. "Computing a quasi-perfect equilibrium of a two-player game," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 42(1), pages 175-192, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:h63mz_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.