IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/fxsuw_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evidence for effective conservation fundraising: Comparing social media with traditional mailshot field experiments

Author

Listed:
  • KUBO, Takahiro

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES))

  • Yokoo, Hide-Fumi

    (Hitotsubashi University)

  • Veríssimo, Diogo

Abstract

Funding shortage limits conservation impact, making it vital to find effective fundraising methods. To explore how traditional and digital conservation fundraising methods perform, we conducted real-world field experiments by using mailshot and Facebook advertisements. We compare three types of message frames (Simple, Seed money, and Ecological) and found that the Seed money frame, which emphasizes the amount already donated, increased the number of donors, whereas the Ecological frame, which focuses on the fact that the fundraiser benefits threatened species, led to a relative reduction in this number. We also found that while on Facebook advertising costs were higher than donations, the opposite was true for the traditional mailshot experiment. Our findings illustrate some of the challenges associated with online fundraising, and importance of behavioral evidence to enhance effective fundraising in conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • KUBO, Takahiro & Yokoo, Hide-Fumi & Veríssimo, Diogo, 2021. "Evidence for effective conservation fundraising: Comparing social media with traditional mailshot field experiments," SocArXiv fxsuw_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:fxsuw_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/fxsuw_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/616e1899b88a570037f1765e/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/fxsuw_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Waldron & Daniel C. Miller & Dave Redding & Arne Mooers & Tyler S. Kuhn & Nate Nibbelink & J. Timmons Roberts & Joseph A. Tobias & John L. Gittleman, 2017. "Reductions in global biodiversity loss predicted from conservation spending," Nature, Nature, vol. 551(7680), pages 364-367, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeetendra Prakash Aryal & Tek B. Sapkota & Ritika Khurana & Arun Khatri-Chhetri & Dil Bahadur Rahut & M. L. Jat, 2020. "Climate change and agriculture in South Asia: adaptation options in smallholder production systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5045-5075, August.
    2. Lee Roberts & Monomita Nandy & Abeer Hassan & Suman Lodh & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Corporate Accountability Towards Species Extinction Protection: Insights from Ecologically Forward-Thinking Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 571-595, July.
    3. Heagney, E.C. & Falster, D.S. & Kovač, M., 2021. "Land clearing in south-eastern Australia: Drivers, policy effects and implications for the future," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. World Bank, 2021. "Banking on Protected Areas," World Bank Publications - Reports 35737, The World Bank Group.
    5. Abhishek Chaudhary & Arne O. Mooers, 2018. "Terrestrial Vertebrate Biodiversity Loss under Future Global Land Use Change Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Francesco Scorza & Angela Pilogallo & Lucia Saganeiti & Beniamino Murgante, 2020. "Natura 2000 Areas and Sites of National Interest (SNI): Measuring (un)Integration between Naturalness Preservation and Environmental Remediation Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Hasita Bhammar & Wendy Li & Christel Maria Moller Molina & Valerie Hickey & Jo Pendry & Urvashi Narain, 2021. "Framework for Sustainable Recovery of Tourism in Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Fleming, Aysha & O'Grady, Anthony P. & Stitzlein, Cara & Ogilvy, Sue & Mendham, Daniel & Harrison, Matthew T., 2022. "Improving acceptance of natural capital accounting in land use decision making: Barriers and opportunities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Seidl, Andrew & Mulungu, Kelvin & Arlaud, Marco & van den Heuvel, Onno & Riva, Massimiliano, 2020. "Finance for nature: A global estimate of public biodiversity investments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    10. Naughtin, Claire & Hajkowicz, Stefan & Schleiger, Emma & Bratanova, Alexandra & Cameron, Alicia & Zamin, T & Dutta, A, 2022. "Our Future World: Global megatrends impacting the way we live over coming decades," MPRA Paper 113900, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. De Valck, Jeremy & Rolfe, John, 2019. "Comparing biodiversity valuation approaches for the sustainable management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 23-31.
    12. Aji Winara & Eva Fauziyah & Suhartono & Ary Widiyanto & Sanudin & Aris Sudomo & Mohamad Siarudin & Aditya Hani & Yonky Indrajaya & Budiman Achmad & Dian Diniyati & Wuri Handayani & Endah Suhaendah & D, 2022. "Assessing the Productivity and Socioeconomic Feasibility of Cocoyam and Teak Agroforestry for Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    13. José Alberto Lara-Pulido & Ángela Mojica & Aaron Bruner & Alejandro Guevara-Sanginés & Cecilia Simon & Felipe Vásquez-Lavin & Cristopher González-Baca & María José Infanzón, 2021. "A Business Case for Marine Protected Areas: Economic Valuation of the Reef Attributes of Cozumel Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Oldekop, Johan A. & Gabay, Monica & Humphreys, David & Kamoto, Judith F.M. & Mutta, Doris N. & Song, Conghe & Timko, Joleen & Rasmussen, Laura Vang & Stoian, Dietmar, 2021. "A framework for analysing contextual factors shaping forest-poverty dynamics," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Kanyao Han & Rezvaneh Rezapour & Katia Nakamura & Dikshya Devkota & Daniel C. Miller & Jana Diesner, 2023. "An expert‐in‐the‐loop method for domain‐specific document categorization based on small training data," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(6), pages 669-684, June.
    16. Donatella Valente & Erica Maria Lovello & Roberto Chirizzi & Irene Petrosillo, 2024. "Multiscale Effects of Xylella fastidiosa on Landscape Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Johan Diepstraten & Mitali Sharma & Mohammad Khalid Sayeed Pasha & Sugoto Roy, 2022. "Assessing Project Proposals Based on National and Global Tiger Action Plans: Lessons from the Integrated Tiger Habitat Conservation Programme (ITHCP)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Carlos Mestanza-Ramón & Robinson J. Herrera Feijoo & Cristhian Chicaiza-Ortiz & Isabel Domínguez Gaibor & Rubén G. Mateo, 2021. "Estimation of Current and Future Suitable Areas for Tapirus pinchaque in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Oliveira Fiorini, Ana Carolina & Mullally, Conner & Swisher, Marilyn & Putz, Francis E., 2020. "Forest cover effects of payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from an impact evaluation in Brazil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Bensch, Gunther & Kluve, Jochen & Stöterau, Jonathan, 2021. "The market-based dissemination of energy-access technologies as a business model for rural entrepreneurs: Evidence from Kenya," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:fxsuw_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.