Author
Abstract
Purpose - The primary role of auditors is to offer fiduciary services to the society and users of the financial reporting. With this role, users placed their trust and dependent on the ability and judgment made by the auditors during their auditing works. However, recent financial scandals involving high profile companies frustrated the public’s expectations, particularly in Malaysia. It is claimed that auditors are not having ethical sensitivity while executing their task in mitigating the fraudulent financial reporting. Therefore, this study aims to examine the influences of ethical orientation, locus of control and firm’s ethical culture on the auditors’ ethical sensitivity in Malaysia. Methodology/approach - This study collected primary data based on a questionnaire survey among audit firms in Klang Valley area and registered with Malaysian Institutes of Accountants. Findings - The results showed ethical sensitivity has a significant negative relationship with relativism and some cases have a significant positive relationship with idealism. Moreover, it found a significant positive relationship between ethical sensitivity and ethical culture. Originality/value – This paper provides benefit to the audit firms, professional bodies, policy makers, and academia in understanding the factors that might increase the sensitivity of auditors in dealing with ethical issues that could lead to fraudulent financial reporting in the company.
Suggested Citation
Johari, Razana Juhaida & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Said, Jamaliah, 2021.
"Investigating Factors that Influence Malaysian Auditors’ Ethical Sensitivity,"
OSF Preprints
uypba_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:osfxxx:uypba_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/uypba_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:uypba_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.