IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/syfxc.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Democracy, Transparency, And Participation Through The Openness Of Public Information In Pemalang Regency, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Susniwati, Susniwati

Abstract

The openness of public information is an essential or inseparable part of democracy. The principles of democracy are participation, inclusion, representation, transparency, accountability, responsibility, free and fair competition, and solidarity. Transparency and participation are linked to the openness of information that allows people to get accurate and suffi cient information. This research focuses on the dynamics of democracy in transparency and participation through the openness of public information in Pemalang Regency. The method that used in this research is the qualitative method, since the data is obtained from observation, interviews, and documentation. The result shows that information is restricted by the classifi cation of public information, mechanism access, limitation of tools to deliver the information. Moreover, the database of information has not met the requirement for more up-to-date information. Also, the level of participation of the people in public information in Pemalang Regency is still low.

Suggested Citation

  • Susniwati, Susniwati, 2021. "Democracy, Transparency, And Participation Through The Openness Of Public Information In Pemalang Regency, Indonesia," OSF Preprints syfxc, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:syfxc
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/syfxc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/614d1d97ed4cbe000bdcb7c4/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/syfxc?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Zhu, 2004. "Information Transparency of Business-to-Business Electronic Markets: A Game-Theoretic Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 670-685, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ting Li & Robert J. Kauffman & Eric van Heck & Peter Vervest & Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2014. "Consumer Informedness and Firm Information Strategy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 345-363, June.
    2. Li, Lin & Li, Guo, 2023. "Integrating logistics service or not? The role of platform entry strategy in an online marketplace," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer, 2005. "Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 61-84, March.
    4. Yuliang Yao & Martin Dresner & Kevin Xiaoguo Zhu, 2019. "“Monday Effect” on Performance Variations in Supply Chain Fulfillment: How Information Technology–Enabled Procurement May Help," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1402-1423, December.
    5. Mikael Linden, 2017. "Price variability, generic substitution, market size and multimarket contacts in the Finnish beta blocker market," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(2), pages 161-174, June.
    6. Ashish Arora & Amy Greenwald & Karthik Kannan & Ramayya Krishnan, 2007. "Effects of Information-Revelation Policies Under Market-Structure Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1234-1248, August.
    7. Anna Balsevich & Svetlana Pivovarova & Elena Podkolzina, 2011. "Information Transparency in Public Procurement: How it Works in Russian Regions," HSE Working papers WP BRP 01/EC/2011, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    8. Byungjoon Yoo & Vidyanand Choudhary & Tridas Mukhopadhyay, 2007. "Electronic B2B Marketplaces with Different Ownership Structures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 952-961, June.
    9. Zhuo (June) Cheng & Barrie R. Nault, 2012. "Relative Industry Concentration and Customer-Driven IT Spillovers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 340-355, June.
    10. Zhuo (June) Cheng & Arun Rai & Feng Tian & Sean Xin Xu, 2021. "Social Learning in Information Technology Investment: The Role of Board Interlocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 547-576, January.
    11. Ilin, Vladimir & Ivetić, Jelena & Simić, Dragan, 2017. "Understanding the determinants of e-business adoption in ERP-enabled firms and non-ERP-enabled firms: A case study of the Western Balkan Peninsula," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 206-223.
    12. Montecchi, Matteo & Plangger, Kirk & West, Douglas C., 2021. "Supply chain transparency: A bibliometric review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    13. Zhang, Xubing & Jiang, Bo, 2014. "Increasing Price Transparency: Implications of Consumer Price Posting for Consumers' Haggling Behavior and a Seller's Pricing Strategies," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 68-85.
    14. Shan Wang & Shi Zheng & Lida Xu & Dezheng Li & Huan Meng, 2008. "A literature review of electronic marketplace research: Themes, theories and an integrative framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(5), pages 555-571, November.
    15. Jozé Braz de Araújo & Silvia Novaes Zilber, 2016. "What Factors Lead Companies to Adopt Social Media in their processes: Proposal and Test of a Measurement Model," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(6), pages 260-290, November.
    16. Carlos Hernán González-Campo & Vanessa Zamora Mina, 2020. "Comportamiento de los agentes en el comercio electrónico según modelos de localización," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 28(1), pages 47-65, June.
    17. Yuliang Yao & Martin Dresner & Jonathan Palmer, 2009. "Private Network EDI vs. Internet Electronic Markets: A Direct Comparison of Fulfillment Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 843-852, May.
    18. He, Dongwei & Zhang, Zhen & Wang, Qiang, 2024. "Information disclosure strategies and bank interest rates pricing decisions," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Nelson Granados & Alok Gupta & Robert J. Kauffman, 2010. "Research Commentary---Information Transparency in Business-to-Consumer Markets: Concepts, Framework, and Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 207-226, June.
    20. Hendrik Jöntgen & Nicholas Valentin Lingnau & Oliver Hinz & Roland Holten, 2024. "This is why we pay—Motivational factors for supporting subscription-based crowdfunding campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:syfxc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.