IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/sxzjf_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business Legitimacy, Agricultural Biodiversity and Environmental Ethics: Insights from Sustainable Bakeries

Author

Listed:
  • Torelli, Riccardo
  • Balluchi, Federica

Abstract

The relationship between biodiversity and ethics is complex and concern the broader environmental ethics. In the agricultural industry, these issues are fundamental and, in the context of agro-biodiversity, bread production activity plays a primary role. Artisanal bread and its derivatives represent basic food products and a short supply chain, with only one intermediate step between the producer of the raw material (flour) and the consumer, represented by bakery. Furthermore, bakery industry is characterized by different needs, motivations, evaluations and ethical/moral values, as well as philosophical considerations towards nature, of producers and consumers. Through a multiple case study on four specific companies of the interesting and relevant natural and sustainable bakery industry, our aim is to understand what are the motivations and ethical-moral drives behind specific ideological and operational choices that have an impact on nature and its biodiversity. It is also intended to investigate how the different ethical-philosophical approaches to nature lead to economic and management choices that are also very distant from each other and have different impacts on the protection and promotion of agricultural biodiversity. This study has allowed to place the positions and choices of some entrepreneurs and artisans in the different ethical approaches to nature and therefore to biodiversity. It was also possible to highlight how the different behaviours of consumers and producers arise from the ethical conceptions through which they look at reality and the consequences of their choices on production and sales activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Torelli, Riccardo & Balluchi, Federica, 2020. "Business Legitimacy, Agricultural Biodiversity and Environmental Ethics: Insights from Sustainable Bakeries," OSF Preprints sxzjf_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:sxzjf_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/sxzjf_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5f99850a10172102e3a42b35/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/sxzjf_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-12-2015-2360 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Silvia Gaia & Michael John Jones, 2017. "UK local councils reporting of biodiversity values: a stakeholder perspective," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(7), pages 1614-1638, September.
    3. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2013-1242 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Thomas Cuckston, 2017. "Ecology-centred accounting for biodiversity in the production of a blanket bog," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(7), pages 1537-1567, September.
    5. Mark C. Freeman & Ben Groom, 2013. "Biodiversity valuation and the discount rate problem," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 715-745, June.
    6. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-02-2013-1226 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-12-2015-2363 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Javed Siddiqui, 2013. "Mainstreaming biodiversity accounting: potential implications for a developing economy," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 779-805, June.
    9. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-02-2013-1234 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Gunnar Rimmel & Kristina Jonäll, 2013. "Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: corporate disclosure and preparers' views," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 746-778, June.
    11. Spash, Clive L. & Urama, Kevin & Burton, Rob & Kenyon, Wendy & Shannon, Peter & Hill, Gary, 2009. "Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 955-964, February.
    12. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-12-2015-2324 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Clément Feger & Laurent Mermet, 2017. "A blueprint towards accounting for the management of ecosystems," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(7), pages 1511-1536, September.
    14. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-12-2015-2367 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Sanjay V. Lanka & Iqbal Khadaroo & Steffen Böhm, 2017. "Agroecology accounting: biodiversity and sustainable livelihoods from the margins," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(7), pages 1592-1613, September.
    16. repec:sae:envval:v:11:y:2002:i:1:p:3-25 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Javed Siddiqui, 2013. "Mainstreaming biodiversity accounting: potential implications for a developing economy," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 779-805, June.
    18. David Tilman, 2000. "Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6783), pages 208-211, May.
    19. Matias Laine & Eija Vinnari, 2017. "The transformative potential of counter accounts: a case study of animal rights activism," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(7), pages 1481-1510, September.
    20. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-12-2015-2330 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Dennis van Liempd & Jacob Busch, 2013. "Biodiversity reporting in Denmark," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 833-872, June.
    22. Sian Sullivan & Mike Hannis, 2017. "“Mathematics maybe, but not money”," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(7), pages 1459-1480, September.
    23. Mark C. Freeman & Ben Groom, 2013. "Biodiversity valuation and the discount rate problem," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 715-745, June.
    24. Helen Tregidga, 2013. "Biodiversity offsetting: problematisation of an emerging governance regime," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 806-832, June.
    25. Clément Feger & Laurent Mermet, 2017. "A blueprint towards accounting for the management of ecosystems," Post-Print hal-01930913, HAL.
    26. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-06-2017-2963 is not listed on IDEAS
    27. Michael John Jones & Jill Frances Solomon, 2013. "Problematising accounting for biodiversity," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 668-687, June.
    28. Thomas Cuckston, 2013. "Bringing tropical forest biodiversity conservation into financial accounting calculation," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 688-714, June.
    29. Helen Tregidga, 2013. "Biodiversity offsetting: problematisation of an emerging governance regime," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 806-832, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torelli, Riccardo & Balluchi, Federica, 2020. "Business Legitimacy, Agricultural Biodiversity and Environmental Ethics: Insights from Sustainable Bakeries," OSF Preprints sxzjf, Center for Open Science.
    2. Madlen Sobkowiak, 2023. "The making of imperfect indicators for biodiversity: A case study of UK biodiversity performance measurement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 336-352, January.
    3. Venturelli, Andrea & Ligorio, Lorenzo & de Nuccio, Elbano, 2023. "Biodiversity accountability in water utilities: A case study," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Jan Bebbington & Tom Cuckston & C. Feger, 2021. "Biodiversity," Post-Print hal-03746729, HAL.
    5. Marco-Fondevila, Miguel & Álvarez-Etxeberría, Igor, 2023. "Trends in private sector engagement with biodiversity: EU listed companies' disclosure and indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    6. Rayan Alqubaysi & Asaad Mubarak Hussien Musa, 2024. "Assessing Biodiversity and Threatened Species Disclosure among Top Saudi Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-14, August.
    7. C. Feger & Laurent Mermet, 2021. "Advances in accounting for biodiversity and ecosystems: a typology focusing upon the environmental results imperative [Innovations comptables pour la biodiversité et les écosystèmes : une typologie," Post-Print hal-02549016, HAL.
    8. Lee Roberts & Abeer Hassan & Ahmed Elamer & Monomita Nandy, 2021. "Biodiversity and extinction accounting for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 705-720, January.
    9. Cho, Charles H. & Senn, Juliette & Sobkowiak, Madlen, 2022. "Sustainability at stake during COVID-19: Exploring the role of accounting in addressing environmental crises," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Bigoni, Michele & Mohammed, Sideeq, 2023. "Critique is unsustainable: A polemic," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Azizi, Leyla & Scope, Christoph & Ladusch, Anne & Sassen, Remmer, 2025. "Biodiversity disclosure in the European finance sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Olivier Boiral, 2016. "Accounting for the Unaccountable: Biodiversity Reporting and Impression Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 751-768, June.
    13. Comte, Adrien & Sylvie Campagne, C. & Lange, Sabine & Bruzón, Adrián García & Hein, Lars & Santos-Martín, Fernando & Levrel, Harold, 2022. "Ecosystem accounting: Past scientific developments and future challenges," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    14. Cuckston, Thomas, 2018. "Creating financial value for tropical forests by disentangling people from nature," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 219-234.
    15. Haque, Faizul & Jones, Michael John, 2020. "European firms’ corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity from 2002 to 2016," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    16. Lee Roberts & Nikoletta Georgiou & Abeer Mohamed Hassan, 2023. "Investigating biodiversity and circular economy disclosure practices: Insights from global firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1053-1069, May.
    17. Tweedie, Jonathan, 2023. "The emancipatory potential of counter accounting: A Žižekian critique," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    18. Laurent Mermet & C. Feger, 2022. "New Business Models for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management Services: An Action Research With a Large Environmental Sector Company," Post-Print hal-02976891, HAL.
    19. Samuel Jack Anthony & Angus Morrison‐Saunders, 2023. "Analysing corporate forest disclosure: How does business value biodiversity?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 624-638, January.
    20. Chris A. Kelsall, 2020. "Ecological Management Accounting—Taking into Account Sustainability, Does Accounting Have Far to Travel?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:sxzjf_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.