IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/nr456.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial Inclusion or Exploitation? An Integrative Review of Online Lending Applications (OLAs) in the Philippines: Analyzing User Experiences, Regulatory Challenges, and Implications for Consumer Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Villarino, Resti Tito

    (Cebu Technological University)

  • Villarino, Maureen Lorence

Abstract

Background: Online lending applications (OLAs) are rapidly gaining traction in the Philippines, offering previously unbanked individuals access to credit. However, this burgeoning sector is now under scrutiny due to numerous allegations of predatory practices, harassment, and even public shaming, raising significant concerns. Objective: This integrated review critically examines the landscape of OLAs in the Philippines, focusing on user experiences, regulatory constraints, and considerations related to financial equity and consumer protection. Methods: The authors followed Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) integrative review methodology, analyzing app ratings and reviews for 40 OLAs listed in the Google Play Store from January 1, 2024, to July 31, 2024. Cross-referencing was performed using the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration data. The analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS version 26 and MAXQDA version 2020. Results: The review found that 80% (32 out of 40) of OLAs were moderately rated (3.5-4.4 out of 5.0), suggesting general user satisfaction. However, only 25% (10 out of 40) of these OLAs were registered with the SEC. Critical themes such as high interest rates, hidden charges, and aggressive collection practices were more prevalent among non-registered OLAs. The absence of highly negative ratings (below 2.4) suggests possible rating manipulations. Thematic analysis revealed positive themes like convenience, speed, and accessibility, contrasted by negative themes including predatory practices, lack of transparency, and poor customer service. Conclusion: The OLA landscape in the Philippines is complex, balancing the need for accessible credit with the imperative of stronger regulatory oversight and consumer protection. This review highlights the necessity of enhancing regulatory monitoring and consumer safeguards to ensure financial innovation benefits vulnerable borrowers without exposing them to undue risk. Keywords: consumer protection, digital financial literacy, financial inclusion, fintech regulation, online lending in the Philippines, predatory practices

Suggested Citation

  • Villarino, Resti Tito & Villarino, Maureen Lorence, 2024. "Financial Inclusion or Exploitation? An Integrative Review of Online Lending Applications (OLAs) in the Philippines: Analyzing User Experiences, Regulatory Challenges, and Implications for Consumer Pr," OSF Preprints nr456, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:nr456
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/nr456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66b60b9196153badb8a1ae9e/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/nr456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    consumer protection; digital financial literacy; financial inclusion; fintech regulation; online lending in the philippines; predatory practices;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:nr456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.