IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/nf8xw.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Birth of Homo Œconomicus: The methodological debate on the economic agent from J.S. Mill to V. Pareto

Author

Listed:
  • Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime

    (Goldsmiths, University of London)

  • Bee, Michele

Abstract

This paper proposes a genealogy of the concept of homo œconomicus as it emerged from the methodological debate on the economic agent of political economy. If Mill gave birth to the economic man in his 1836 Essay “On the Definition of Political Economy,” he certainly did not baptize him. The expression was introduced by Francis A. Walker after Mill passed away in the 1870s. Economic man acquired its Latin name of homo œconomicus under the pen of French Catholic economist Claudio Jannet in 1878. Yet, only at the end of the century did Maffeo Pantaleoni (1889) proudly reclaim homo œconomicus as a building block of pure economics. In reaction to the evolutionary hedonism of Pantaleoni, Vilfredo Pareto then cleansed the concept of homo œconomicus and realized the Millian project of an abstract science based on an economic agent.

Suggested Citation

  • Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime & Bee, Michele, 2022. "The Birth of Homo Œconomicus: The methodological debate on the economic agent from J.S. Mill to V. Pareto," OSF Preprints nf8xw, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:nf8xw
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/nf8xw
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6251997bbe9ffc13d6a02def/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/nf8xw?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hollander, Samuel & Peart, Sandra, 1999. "John Stuart Mill's Method In Principle and Practice: A Review of the Evidence," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 369-397, December.
    2. Nicola Giocoli, 2003. "Modeling Rational Agents," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2585.
    3. Luigino Bruni & Robert Sugden, 2007. "The road not taken: how psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(516), pages 146-173, January.
    4. Hands,D. Wade, 2001. "Reflection without Rules," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521797962, January.
    5. N. B. de Marchi, 1972. "Mill and Cairnes and the Emergence of Marginalism in England," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 344-363, Fall.
    6. Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), 2016. "Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13936.
    7. Boianovsky, Mauro & Tarascio, Vincent J., 1998. "Mechanical Inertia and Economic Dynamics: Pareto on Business Cycles," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 5-23, March.
    8. Martin Gross & Vincent J. Tarascio, 1998. "Pareto's Theory of Choice," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 171-187, Summer.
    9. Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), 2016. "Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume II," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13937.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dieter Bögenhold, 2021. "Economics in the Social Sciences: Emergence and Co-existence of Different Discourses and Methods," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 49(4), pages 331-333, December.
    2. Assistant, JHET & Graf, Rüdiger, 2020. "Of Alcohol, Apes, And Taxes: Günter Schmölders And The Reinvention Of Economics In Behavioral Terms," OSF Preprints vyarx, Center for Open Science.
    3. Aura María García Pabón, editor & Ana María Pérez Herrán, editor & Ismael Beltrán Prado, editor, 2019. "Competencia económica : reflexiones sobre los diez años de la Ley 1340 de 2009," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Economía, number 80.
    4. Petracca, Enrico, 2015. "A tale of paradigm clash: Simon, situated cognition and the interpretation of bounded rationality," MPRA Paper 64517, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Vladimir Avtonomov, 2018. "Austrian economics and its reception in different countries," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7, April.
    6. Giandomenica Becchio, 2020. "The Two Blades of Occam's Razor in Economics: Logical and Heuristic," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Edwards, José, 2017. "Journal of the History of Economic Thought preprints - Harry Helson’s Adaptation-Level Theory, Happiness Treadmills, and Behavioral Economics," SocArXiv 6cvbh, Center for Open Science.
    8. Mihail Yanchev, 2023. "Uncertainty - Definition and Classification for the Task of Economic Forecasting," Bulgarian Economic Papers bep-2023-03, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria // Center for Economic Theories and Policies at Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, revised Mar 2023.
    9. Madarász, Aladár, 2018. "A "túl elméleti" tőzsdeügynök: David Ricardo és az Alapelvek kétszáz éve ["Too theoretical" a stockjobber: 200 years of David Ricardo and his principles]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 449-483.
    10. Dieter Bögenhold, 2020. "History of Economic Thought as an Analytic Tool: why Past Intellectual Ideas Must Be Acknowledged as Lighthouses for the Future," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 26(1), pages 73-87, February.
    11. Antonio Magliulo, 2018. "The reception of Austrian economics in Italy," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 4(1), pages 65-86, April.
    12. D. Wade Hands, 2009. "Effective Tension in Robbins' Economic Methodology," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 76(s1), pages 831-844, October.
    13. John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands, 2011. "Introduction: The Changing Character of Economic Methodology," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Carl Christian von Weizsäcker, 2011. "Homo Oeconomicus Adaptivus – Die Logik des Handelns bei veränderlichen Präferenzen," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2011_10, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    15. Francesco GUALA, 2017. "Preferences: Neither Behavioural nor Mental," Departmental Working Papers 2017-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    16. Arthur Brackmann Netto, 2017. "The Double Edge of Case-Studies: A Frame-Based Definition of Economic Models," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_21, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    17. Mjøset, Lars, 2006. "The study of Nordic varieties of capitalism: A plea for contextual generalization through comparative specification," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 8(1), pages 4-11.
    18. Martin Binder, 2009. "Some Considerations Regarding the Problem of Multidimensional Utility," Jena Economics Research Papers 2009-099, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    19. Nikil Mukerji & Adriano Mannino, 2023. "Nudge Me If You Can! Why Order Ethicists Should Embrace the Nudge Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(2), pages 309-324, August.
    20. Andrew E. Clark & Ed Diener & Yannis Georgellis & Richard E. Lucas, 2008. "Lags And Leads in Life Satisfaction: a Test of the Baseline Hypothesis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(529), pages 222-243, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:nf8xw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.