IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/hmgnq_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reducing barriers to open science by standardizing practices and realigning incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Adimoelja, Alvina
  • Athreya, Advait

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Open science can accelerate the pace of research and contribute to a more equitable society. However, the current culture of scientific research is not optimally structured to promote extensive sharing of a range of outputs. In this policy position paper, we outline current open science practices and key bottlenecks in their broader adoption. We propose that national science agencies create a digital infrastructure framework that would standardize open science principles and make them actionable. We also suggest ways of redefining research success to align better with open science, and to incentivize a system where sharing various research outputs is beneficial to researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Adimoelja, Alvina & Athreya, Advait, 2022. "Reducing barriers to open science by standardizing practices and realigning incentives," OSF Preprints hmgnq_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:hmgnq_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/hmgnq_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/62cdd5bef66a9414c823069f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/hmgnq_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:hmgnq_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.