IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/hcwgp_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is More Always Better? Evaluating Accessibility to Parks and Forests in 33 European Cities Using Sustainable Modes of Transportation

Author

Listed:
  • , Marcin Wozniak

    (Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland)

  • Radzimski, Adam
  • Wajchman-Świtalska, Sandra

Abstract

Enhancing quality of life in contemporary cities hinges on convenient access to parks and forests, offering avenues for physical activity and social engagement, as well as benefits for mental health and opportunities for educational pursuits. This comprehensive study delves into the accessibility to parks and forests across 33 major European cities, employing an interdisciplinary framework drawing from transportation and urban planning methodologies. By analyzing accessibility to urban green spaces (UGS) through sustainable modes of transportation, the research aims at unveiling patterns shaped by population density, terrain elevation, city area and transportation infrastructure. Notably, disparities in accessibility emerge both within and between cities, with urban parks, typically nestled in city centers, exhibiting more equitable accessibility compared to forests, often situated on the outskirts. Further results show that the area of UGS, road network density, public transit availability, and elevation gradients influence parks and forests accessibility with different strengths and in different configurations, unveiling the complexity of green space distribution within urban landscapes. Across transportation modes, disparities in accessibility are most pronounced for pedestrians, accentuating the need for targeted interventions to bridge the gaps. The study also emphasizes the significance of discerning qualitative distinctions among diverse green spaces, advocating for tailored strategies in UGS planning. Acknowledging the pivotal role of parks in augmenting UGS accessibility, particularly in densely populated areas and for short-distance journeys, the paper underscores the urgency of fair provision. Finally, this research furnishes insights for policymakers and urban planners committed to fostering inclusive, healthy and sustainable urban environments.

Suggested Citation

  • , Marcin Wozniak & Radzimski, Adam & Wajchman-Świtalska, Sandra, 2024. "Is More Always Better? Evaluating Accessibility to Parks and Forests in 33 European Cities Using Sustainable Modes of Transportation," OSF Preprints hcwgp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:hcwgp_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/hcwgp_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65ef12888992ec0c5278872a/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/hcwgp_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vita Žlender & Stefano Gemin, 2023. "Different Environments and Physical Activity before and during the COVID-19 Lockdown: Data from Slovenia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Daniel Delling & Thomas Pajor & Renato F. Werneck, 2015. "Round-Based Public Transit Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 591-604, August.
    3. Carlos Moreno & Zaheer Allam & Didier Chabaud & Catherine Gall & Florent Pratlong, 2021. "Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities," Post-Print hal-03549665, HAL.
    4. Breusch, T S & Pagan, A R, 1979. "A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(5), pages 1287-1294, September.
    5. Guzman, Luis A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Rivera, Carlos, 2017. "Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 236-246.
    6. Sharma, Gajanand & Patil, Gopal R., 2021. "Public transit accessibility approach to understand the equity for public healthcare services: A case study of Greater Mumbai," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Tsung-Ming Tsao & Jing-Shiang Hwang & Sung-Tsun Lin & Charlene Wu & Ming-Jer Tsai & Ta-Chen Su, 2022. "Forest Bathing Is Better than Walking in Urban Park: Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Function between Urban and Forest Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Tsuyoshi Hamano & Kazumichi Tominaga & Miwako Takeda & Kristina Sundquist & Toru Nabika, 2015. "Accessible Transportation, Geographic Elevation, and Masticatory Ability Among Elderly Residents of a Rural Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-9, June.
    9. Robert Geisberger & Peter Sanders & Dominik Schultes & Christian Vetter, 2012. "Exact Routing in Large Road Networks Using Contraction Hierarchies," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 388-404, August.
    10. Annemarie Ruijsbroek & Mariël Droomers & Hanneke Kruize & Elise Van Kempen & Christopher J. Gidlow & Gemma Hurst & Sandra Andrusaityte & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen & Jolanda Maas & Wim Hardyns & Karien St, 2017. "Does the Health Impact of Exposure to Neighbourhood Green Space Differ between Population Groups? An Explorative Study in Four European Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Megan Buckland & Dorina Pojani, 2023. "Green space accessibility in Europe: a comparative study of five major cities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 146-167, January.
    12. Ye, Changdong & Hu, Lingqian & Li, Min, 2018. "Urban green space accessibility changes in a high-density city: A case study of Macau from 2010 to 2015," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 106-115.
    13. Sjerp de Vries & Arjen E. Buijs & Robbert P. H. Snep, 2020. "Environmental Justice in The Netherlands: Presence and Quality of Greenspace Differ by Socioeconomic Status of Neighbourhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Delbosc, Alexa & Currie, Graham, 2011. "Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1252-1259.
    15. Jenő Zsolt Farkas & Zoltán Kovács & György Csomós, 2022. "The availability of green spaces for different socio-economic groups in cities: a case study of Budapest, Hungary," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 97-105, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. , Marcin Wozniak & Radzimski, Adam & Wajchman-Świtalska, Sandra, 2024. "Is More Always Better? Evaluating Accessibility to Parks and Forests in 33 European Cities Using Sustainable Modes of Transportation," OSF Preprints hcwgp, Center for Open Science.
    2. Jin, Tanhua & Cheng, Long & Wang, Kailai & Cao, Jun & Huang, Haosheng & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "Examining equity in accessibility to multi-tier healthcare services across different income households using estimated travel time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Gabriella Vitorino Guimarães & Tálita Floriano Santos & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Jorge Eliécer Córdoba Maquilón & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva, 2020. "Assessment for the Social Sustainability and Equity under the Perspective of Accessibility to Jobs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Kan Wang & Jianjun Bai & Xing Dang, 2020. "Spatial Difference and Equity Analysis for Accessibility to Three-Level Medical Services Based on Actual Medical Behavior in Shaanxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Chen, Zhiwei & Guo, Yujie & Stuart, Amy L. & Zhang, Yu & Li, Xiaopeng, 2019. "Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 529-545.
    6. Sun, Zhe & Zacharias, John, 2020. "Transport equity as relative accessibility in a megacity: Beijing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 8-19.
    7. Jun Yang & Andong Guo & Xueming Li & Tai Huang, 2018. "Study of the Impact of a High-Speed Railway Opening on China’s Accessibility Pattern and Spatial Equality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Dixit, Malvika & Chowdhury, Subeh & Cats, Oded & Brands, Ties & van Oort, Niels & Hoogendoorn, Serge, 2021. "Examining circuity of urban transit networks from an equity perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Ben-Elia, Eran & Benenson, Itzhak, 2019. "A spatially-explicit method for analyzing the equity of transit commuters' accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 31-42.
    10. Chan, Ho-Yin & Chen, Anthony & Li, Guoyuan & Xu, Xiangdong & Lam, William, 2021. "Evaluating the value of new metro lines using route diversity measures: The case of Hong Kong's Mass Transit Railway system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Deboosere, Robbin & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2018. "Evaluating equity and accessibility to jobs by public transport across Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 54-63.
    12. Chen, Zhiwei & Li, Xiaopeng, 2021. "Unobserved heterogeneity in transportation equity analysis: Evidence from a bike-sharing system in southern Tampa," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Sharma, Gajanand & Patil, Gopal R., 2021. "Public transit accessibility approach to understand the equity for public healthcare services: A case study of Greater Mumbai," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Cascetta, Ennio & Cartenì, Armando & Henke, Ilaria & Pagliara, Francesca, 2020. "Economic growth, transport accessibility and regional equity impacts of high-speed railways in Italy: ten years ex post evaluation and future perspectives," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 412-428.
    15. Sharma, Gajanand & Patil, Gopal R., 2024. "Urban spatial structure and equity for urban services through the lens of accessibility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 72-90.
    16. Jinhui Ma & Haijing Huang & Daibin Liu, 2023. "Influences of Spatial Accessibility and Service Capacity on the Utilization of Elderly-Care Facilities: A Case Study of the Main Urban Area of Chongqing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Gu, Zongni & Luo, Xiaolong & Tang, Mi & Liu, Xiaoman, 2023. "Does the edge effect impact the healthcare equity? An examination of the equity in hospitals accessibility in the edge city in multi-scale," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    18. Ilaria Henke & Armando Cartenì & Clorinda Molitierno & Assunta Errico, 2020. "Decision-Making in the Transport Sector: A Sustainable Evaluation Method for Road Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Caterina Malandri & Luca Mantecchini & Filippo Paganelli & Maria Nadia Postorino, 2021. "Public Transport Network Vulnerability and Delay Distribution among Travelers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Luis A. Guzman & Daniel Oviedo & Rafael Cardona, 2018. "Accessibility Changes: Analysis of the Integrated Public Transport System of Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:hcwgp_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.