IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/gx6d3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beraten statt archivieren. Wie öffentlich Beschäftigte ihr Wissen am Arbeitsplatz teilen

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer, Caroline

Abstract

Dieser Artikel untersucht das Teilen von Wissen durch Beschäftigte im öffentlichen Sektor. Wissensteilung ist die zentrale Voraussetzung für das organisationale Wissensmanagement. Es wurde eine Typologie entwickelt, die als Analyseraster vier Verhaltensweisen, Wissen zu teilen, unterscheidet (Berichten, Archivieren, Beraten, Hinweisen). Mithilfe von Daten aus drei Studien (qualitativ und quantitativ) wird beschrieben, wie Mitarbeiter im öffentlichen Sektor ihr Wissen teilen. Dies wurde in der Literatur bisher außer Acht gelassen. Die identifizierten Verhaltensweisen sind mehrheitlich responsiv, statt proaktiv, und richten sich direkt an Wissensnehmer, statt an ein Trägermedium. Sie können daher in der vorgeschlagenen Typologie als beratendes Verhalten eingestuft werden. Das ist weniger ressourcenaufwändig für die Wissensgeber, wirkt sich aber negativ auf die langfristige Speicherung und Auffindbarkeit von Wissen in einer Organisation aus.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, Caroline, 2018. "Beraten statt archivieren. Wie öffentlich Beschäftigte ihr Wissen am Arbeitsplatz teilen," OSF Preprints gx6d3, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:gx6d3
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/gx6d3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5ba8a3699108ce0015f691c4/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/gx6d3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John J Rodwell & Stephen TT Teo, 2004. "Strategic HRM in for-profit and non-profit organizations in a knowledge-intensive industry," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 311-331, September.
    2. Michael Theil, 2002. "The role of translations of verbal into numerical probability expressions in risk management: a meta-analysis," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 177-186, April.
    3. Steve Bundred, 2006. "Solutions to Silos: Joining Up Knowledge," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 125-130, April.
    4. A. Willem & M. Buelens, 2005. "Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organizations: The Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/344, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    5. Fischer, Caroline, 2018. "Motivated to Share Your Knowledge? Development of a scale to measure knowledge sharing motives of public employees," OSF Preprints r5xba, Center for Open Science.
    6. Matzler, Kurt & Mueller, Julia, 2011. "Antecedents of knowledge sharing - Examining the influence of learning and performance orientation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 317-329, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fischer, Caroline, 2018. "Motivated to Share Your Knowledge? Development of a scale to measure knowledge sharing motives of public employees," OSF Preprints r5xba, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Marieta Olaru & Doina I. Popescu, 2018. "An Exploratory Study on Knowledge Management Process Barriers in the Oil Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:6:p:683-695 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Wenan Hu & Jinlian Luo, 2023. "Leader humor and employee creativity: a model integrating pragmatic and affective roles," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 509-528, April.
    4. Andreas Strobl & Jessica Niedermair & Kurt Matzler & Tobias Mussner, 2019. "Triggering Subordinate Innovation Behavior: The Influence Of Leaders’ Dark Personality Traits And Level 5 Leadership Behavior," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-37, June.
    5. Fischer, Caroline, 2018. "Motivated to Share Your Knowledge? Development of a scale to measure knowledge sharing motives of public employees," OSF Preprints r5xba, Center for Open Science.
    6. Rocco Agrifoglio & Concetta Metallo & Primiano Nauta, 2021. "Understanding Knowledge Management in Public Organizations through the Organizational Knowing Perspective: a Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    7. Liliana Hawrysz, 2021. "Dynamic Capabilities Affecting the Functioning of E-Administration in Polish Public Admistration Entities," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 3-22.
    8. Douglas Edward Abrahamson & Jane Goodman-Delahunty, 2014. "Impediments to Information and Knowledge Sharing Within Policing," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, January.
    9. Navin Kumar Saxena & Satyasiba Das, 2022. "Competitive Pressure and the Moderating Role of the Knowledge Network on Internationalization Intent of Indian State-owned Enterprises," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 47-61, January.
    10. Laila Naif Marouf & Naresh Kumar Agarwal, 2016. "Are Faculty Members Ready? Individual Factors Affecting Knowledge Management Readiness in Universities," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Fischer, Caroline & Döring, Matthias, 2021. "Thank You for Sharing! How knowledge sharing and information availability affect public employees' job satisfaction," SocArXiv nvfsr, Center for Open Science.
    12. Luigino Bruni & Vittorio Pelligra & Tommaso Reggiani & Matteo Rizzolli, 2020. "The Pied Piper: Prizes, Incentives, and Motivation Crowding-in," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 643-658, October.
    13. Vivianne H. M. Visschers & Ree M. Meertens & Wim W. F. Passchier & Nanne N. K. De Vries, 2009. "Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of the Research Literature," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 267-287, February.
    14. Chuanshen Qin & Bo Fan, 2016. "Factors that influence information sharing, collaboration, and coordination across administrative agencies at a Chinese university," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 637-664, August.
    15. Jyoti Verma & Anamika Sinha, 2016. "Knowledge Sharing in Cross-Functional Teams and its Antecedents: Role of Mutual Trust as a Moderator," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Riege, Anine H. & Teigen, Karl Halvor, 2013. "Additivity neglect in probability estimates: Effects of numeracy and response format," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 41-52.
    17. Jaeyong Lee & Myung H. Jin & Geunpil Ryu, 2021. "Motivated to Share? Using the Person–Environment Fit Theory to Explain the Link between Public Service Motivation and Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Jiaqi Liu & Zhenping Zhang & Jiayin Qi & Hong Wu & Manyi Chen, 2019. "Understanding the Impact of Opinion Leaders’ Characteristics on Online Group Knowledge-Sharing Engagement from In-Group and Out-Group Perspectives: Evidence from a Chinese Online Knowledge-Sharing Com," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Amanda Budde-Sung, 2013. "The Invisible Meets the Intangible: Culture’s Impact on Intellectual Property Protection," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 345-359, October.
    20. Ibrahim S. Abdullah, 2017. "Influences of Knowledge Sharing on Individual Performance in Saudi Organisations," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-15, June.
    21. Sumi Jha & Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya, 2013. "Learning Orientation and Performance Orientation: Scale Development and Its Relationship with Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(1), pages 43-54, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:gx6d3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.