Author
Abstract
Complete-case analyses can be biased if missing data are not missing completely at random. We propose simple sensitivity analyses that apply to complete-case estimates of treatment effects; these analyses use only simple summary data and obviate specifying the mechanism of missingness and making distributional assumptions. Bias arises when: (1) treatment effects differ between retained and non-retained participants; or (2) among non-retained participants, the estimate is biased because conditioning on retention has induced a backdoor path. We thus bound the overall treatment effect on the difference scale by specifying: (1) the unobserved treatment effect among non-retained participants; (2) the strengths of association that unobserved variables have with the exposure and with the outcome among retained participants (“induced confounding associations”). Working with the former sensitivity parameter subsumes certain existing methods of worst-case imputation, while also accommodating less conservative assumptions (e.g., that the treatment is not detrimental even among non-retained participants). As an analog to the E-value for confounding, we propose the M-value, which represents, for a specified treatment effect among non-retained participants, the strength of induced confounding associations required to reduce the treatment effect to the null or to any other value. These methods could help characterize the robustness of complete-case analyses to potential bias due to missing data.
Suggested Citation
Mathur, Maya B, 2022.
"The M-value: A simple sensitivity analysis for bias due to missing data in treatment effect estimates,"
OSF Preprints
e9bzc_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:osfxxx:e9bzc_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/e9bzc_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:e9bzc_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.