IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/dx6nv.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corporate Crime: Result of Spontaneous or Constructed Order?

Author

Listed:
  • Glebovskiy, Alexander

Abstract

The article explores the origin of corporate crime through the lens of spontaneous and constructed orders. From a macro perspective, corporate crime can be understood as an emergent phenomenon within a self-regulating market, driven by the interactions of self-interested individuals. From a micro perspective, it is often the result of deliberate actions by individuals within organizations, reflecting a constructed order. Recognizing this dual nature is essential for developing effective strategies to address corporate crime.

Suggested Citation

  • Glebovskiy, Alexander, 2024. "Corporate Crime: Result of Spontaneous or Constructed Order?," OSF Preprints dx6nv, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:dx6nv
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/dx6nv
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6731e8e986b9f32f9e62f4b8/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/dx6nv?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boettke, Peter, 2011. "Teaching economics, appreciating spontaneous order, and economics as a public science," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 265-274.
    2. Todd Zywicki, 2008. "Spontaneous order and the common law: Gordon Tullock’s critique," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 35-53, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Wagner, 2012. "Remembering Bill Niskanen: pursuing economics as a public science in the service of liberty," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 1-7, October.
    2. Peter J. Boettke & Rosolino A. Candela, 2015. "Rivalry, Polycentricism, and Institutional Evolution," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: New Thinking in Austrian Political Economy, volume 19, pages 1-19, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    3. Alain Marciano, 2020. "Buchanan, Popular Myths, and the Social Responsibility of Economists," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(4), pages 1613-1629, April.
    4. Stringham, Edward Peter & Zywicki, Todd J., 2011. "Hayekian anarchism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 290-301, May.
    5. Palagashvili,Liya & Piano,Ennio & Skarbek,David, 2017. "The Decline and Rise of Institutions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316649176, November.
    6. Régis Servant, 2010. "La recherche de bonnes règles sociales: objet de science et de choix démocratique ? Le cas de Friedrich Hayek," Post-Print hal-00641440, HAL.
    7. Alice Guerra & Maria Maraki & Baptiste Massenot & Christian Thöni, 2023. "Deterrence, settlement, and litigation under adversarial versus inquisitorial systems," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 331-356, September.
    8. Jennis Biser, 2014. "Law-and-economics: why Gordon Tullock prefers Napoleon Bonaparte over the Duke of Wellington; and why he may end up on St. Helena," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 261-279, January.
    9. Albertazzi, Andrea & Ploner, Matteo & Vaccari, Federico, 2024. "Welfare and competition in expert advice markets," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 74-103.
    10. Vlad Tarko & Andrew Farrant, 2019. "The efficiency of regulatory arbitrage," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 141-166, October.
    11. Rajagopalan Shruti, 2017. "Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Systems: Error and Valuation," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 12(s1), pages 1-9, July.
    12. Michael David Thomas, 2019. "Reapplying behavioral symmetry: public choice and choice architecture," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 11-25, July.
    13. Daniel J. D’Amico, 2018. "The law and economics of sycophancy," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 424-439, December.
    14. Alain Marciano, 2023. "Teaching economics, defending the free market and justifying government intervention: The ABCs of Buchanan’s political economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 441-460, September.
    15. Régis Servant, 2010. "La recherche de bonnes règles sociales : objet de science ou de choix démocratique ? Le cas de Friedrich Hayek," Post-Print hal-03498010, HAL.
    16. Barbara Luppi & Francesco Parisi, 2012. "Litigation and legal evolution: does procedure matter?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 181-201, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:dx6nv. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.