IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/dmsp9_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Scrambling for higher metrics in the Journal Impact Factor bubble period: a real-world problem in science management and its implications

Author

Listed:
  • Tran, Trung
  • Linh, Hoang Khanh
  • La, Viet-Phuong
  • Ho, Manh-Toan

    (Thanh Tay University Hanoi)

Abstract

Universities and funders in many countries have been using Journal Impact Factor (JIF) as an indicator for research and grant assessment despite its controversial nature as a statistical representation of scientific quality. This study investigates how the changes of JIF over the years can affect its role in research evaluation and science management by using JIF data from annual Journal Citation Reports (JCR) to illustrate the changes. The descriptive statistics find out an increase in the median JIF for the top 50 journals in the JCR, from 29.300 in 2017 to 33.162 in 2019. Moreover, on average, elite journal families have up to 27 journals in the top 50. In the group of journals with a JIF of lower than 1, the proportion has shrunk by 14.53% in the 2015–2019 period. The findings suggest a potential ‘JIF bubble period’ that science policymaker, university, public fund managers, and other stakeholders should pay more attention to JIF as a criterion for quality assessment to ensure more efficient science management.

Suggested Citation

  • Tran, Trung & Linh, Hoang Khanh & La, Viet-Phuong & Ho, Manh-Toan, 2020. "Scrambling for higher metrics in the Journal Impact Factor bubble period: a real-world problem in science management and its implications," OSF Preprints dmsp9_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:dmsp9_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/dmsp9_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5e410b9ef1369e02e28adb28/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/dmsp9_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:dmsp9_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.