IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/93ceq_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Too Fragile to Succeed? Electoral Strength, Austerity and Economic Confidence

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Chendi

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Ferrara, Federico Maria
  • Sattler, Thomas

    (University of Geneva)

Abstract

In the wake of the Great Recession, European governments implemented harsh fiscal austerity measures to restore economic confidence. Yet, the economic success of these policies varied significantly. This raises the question of whether and under what conditions austerity is an effective policy strategy to restore economic stability. This study shows that the impact of austerity on economic confidence is conditioned by an important political factor, namely the electoral strength of the government. Our macro-level time series analysis tracks the impact of austerity announcements on economic confidence over time in 15 European countries during the Great Recession, showing that austerity leads to a decrease in economic confidence. However, the negative impact is substantially smaller when austerity is announced by an electorally strong government vis-à-vis a fragile one. Our individual-level survey experiment with a total of 7,500 respondents in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain indicates that the negative effects of spending cuts on both pocketbook and sociotropic concerns are particularly pronounced when austerity policies are announced by governments that are losing electoral support. Austerity, therefore, is perceived as more credible and effective when carried out by electorally strong governments compared to weak ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Chendi & Ferrara, Federico Maria & Sattler, Thomas, 2023. "Too Fragile to Succeed? Electoral Strength, Austerity and Economic Confidence," OSF Preprints 93ceq_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:93ceq_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/93ceq_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/650982e85a0a8116c404489f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/93ceq_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:93ceq_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.