IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/8k43a.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ethical Delimitation of Client Satisfaction, Client Sophistication and Client Influence in Property Valuation Practice in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Ogunbiyi, James O.

    (University of Ibadan)

  • Adeleke, Folake
  • Oladimeji, Dare

Abstract

There are three major concepts that exist to determine and explain the decision-making behaviours of professionals while executing client assignments; viz: Client Satisfaction (CS), Client Sophistication (CSpth) and Client Influence (CI). There is paucity of articles that have attempted to examine the three concepts together; to give a clear distinction, and to report the critical implications on ethics of property valuation for financial reporting and other purposes. Hence, as a contribution to positioning property valuation as an anti-corruption tool, this study attempts to present the differential characteristics of the three concepts so as to further guide Estate Surveyors and Valuers in Nigeria on ethical standards in professional practice. Thirty (30) previous studies were systematically selected from database-search of best-ranked international journals found on the Real Estate Journal List that was recently determined and published by the American Real Estate Society. This was done to give credence to the conceptualisation and discussions in this paper. Moreover, this paper adopts the qualitative, analytical procedure of content analysis in the review of 30 extant studies based on the three concepts under study. Findings of this study show that issues of client satisfaction border around valuation accuracy, rationality, consistency, reliability as well as professional's unethical conducts. Client sophistication relates to their having some technical skills, expertise, as well as the influence of readily available knowledge through the internet and computational benefits of advanced valuation models. Client influence may also be reflected in valuation briefs; fee payment arrangements; valuation report/figures; valuation process; and the nature of valuation information made available to the valuer. The current study gives a clearer elucidation of the differences and implications of the concepts of CS, CSpth and CI on client-valuer engagements in property valuation practice. The study concludes that, while working to obtain ‘client satisfaction’ during valuations, it is crucial that valuers are intentional in being focused - by ensuring strict personal adherence to ethical standards in order to prevent undue client influence that may result from client sophistication.

Suggested Citation

  • Ogunbiyi, James O. & Adeleke, Folake & Oladimeji, Dare, 2024. "Ethical Delimitation of Client Satisfaction, Client Sophistication and Client Influence in Property Valuation Practice in Nigeria," OSF Preprints 8k43a, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:8k43a
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8k43a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66290d47f49cdf14f2d25278/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/8k43a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonnie J. Johnson & Mary Kay Peck & Steven A. Preston, 2017. "City Managers Have Ethics Too? Comparing Planning and City Management Codes of Ethics," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(2), pages 183-201, April.
    2. Deborah Levy & Edward Schuck, 2005. "The influence of clients on valuations: the clients' perspective," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(2), pages 182-201, April.
    3. O.A. Ogunba & C.A. Ajayi, 2007. "The response of Nigerian valuers to increasing sophistication in investors' requirements," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 43-61, February.
    4. Bartley R. Danielsen & David M. Harrison & Robert A. Van Ness & Richard S. Warr, 2009. "REIT Auditor Fees and Financial Market Transparency," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 37(3), pages 515-557, September.
    5. Deborah Levy & Edward Schuck, 1999. "The influence of clients on valuations," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 380-400, October.
    6. George H. Lentz & Ko Wang, 1998. "Residential Appraisal and the Lending Process: A Survey of Issues," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 15(1), pages 11-40.
    7. J. Andrew Hansz & Julian Diaz III, 2001. "Valuation Bias in Commercial Appraisal: A Transaction Price Feedback Experiment," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 553-565, April.
    8. Chukwuma C. Nwuba & Uche S. Egwuatu & Babatunde M. Salawu, 2015. "Client influence on valuation: valuers' motives to succumb," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 147-172, June.
    9. Joanna Poon & Michael Brownlow, 2014. "Competency expectations for property professionals in Australia," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 256-281, April.
    10. Alastair Adair & Norman Hutchison, 2005. "The reporting of risk in real estate appraisal property risk scoring," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 254-268, June.
    11. J. Andrew Hansz, 2004. "The use of a pending mortgage reference point in valuation judgment," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(3), pages 259-268, June.
    12. C.M. Lizieri, 2003. "Occupier Requirements in Commercial Real Estate Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 1151-1169, May.
    13. Carolyn G. Loh & Richard K. Norton, 2013. "Planning Consultants and Local Planning," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(2), pages 138-147, April.
    14. Richard A. Graff & Michael S. Young, 1999. "The Magnitude of Random Appraisal Error in Commercial Real Estate Valuation," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 17(1), pages 33-54.
    15. Ferrell, O.C. & Harrison, Dana E. & Ferrell, Linda & Hair, Joe F., 2019. "Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 491-501.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neil Crosby & Steven Devaney & Colin Lizieri & Patrick McAllister, 2018. "Can Institutional Investors Bias Real Estate Portfolio Appraisals? Evidence from the Market Downturn," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 651-667, February.
    2. Philippe Cyrenne & Robert Fenton & Joseph Warbanski, 2006. "Historic Buildings and Rehabilitation Expenditures: A Panel Data Approach," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 28(4), pages 349-380.
    3. Robert Edelstein & Daniel Quan, 2006. "How Does Appraisal Smoothing Bias Real Estate Returns Measurement?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 41-60, February.
    4. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    5. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Patrick Krieger & Carsten Lausberg, 2021. "Entscheidungen, Entscheidungsfindung und Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Immobilienwirtschaft: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [Decisions, decision-making and decisions support systems in r," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, April.
    7. Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro & J. Alfredo Flores‐Hernández & Lourdes Pérez & Guadalupe Valera‐Blanes, 2020. "CSR and branding in emerging economies: The effect of incomes and education," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2765-2776, November.
    8. Maurizio d’Amato, 2007. "Comparing Rough Set Theory with Multiple Regression Analysis as Automated Valuation Methodologies," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 42-65.
    9. Rojas-de-Gracia, María-Mercedes & Casado-Molina, Ana-María & Alarcón-Urbistondo, Pilar, 2021. "Relationship between reputational aspects of companies and their share price in the online environment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Petr Sunega & Martin Lux & Petr Kubala, 2022. "Comparison of purchase and appraisal prices of flats in the Czech Republic in 2019 [Komparace kupních a odhadních cen bytů v ČR za rok 2019]," Oceňování, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 15(1), pages 43-55.
    11. Nappi-Choulet, Ingrid & Décamps, Aurélien, 2011. "Is Sustainability Attractive for Corporate Real Estate Decisions ?," ESSEC Working Papers WP1106, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    12. Irene Cheloti & Manya Mooya, 2021. "Valuation Problems in Developing Countries: A New Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Jung-Jung Chang & Chia-Li Lin, 2023. "Determining the Sustainable Development Strategies and Adoption Paths for Public Bike-Sharing Service Systems (PBSSSs) under Various Users’ Considerations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Walsh, Patrick & Griffiths, Charles & Guignet, Dennis & Klemick, Heather, 2017. "Modeling the Property Price Impact of Water Quality in 14 Chesapeake Bay Counties," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 103-113.
    15. Tao, Hu & Zhuang, Shan & Xue, Rui & Cao, Wei & Tian, Jinfang & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Environmental Finance: An Interdisciplinary Review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Cheng-Wen Lee & Chin Kun Chang, 2021. "Exploring the Assessment Model of Corporate Ethics Influencing Organizational Performance," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 1-1.
    17. repec:uts:finphd:35 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Charles Ka Yui LEUNG & Wai Yip MA & Jun ZHANG, 2014. "The Market Valuation of Interior Design and Developer Strategies: A Simple Theory and Some Evidence," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 17(1), pages 63-107.
    19. Steven P. Devaney & Stephen L. Lee & Michael S. Young, 2007. "Serial persistence in individual real estate returns in the UK," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(3), pages 241-273, May.
    20. Li Ma & Yue Cao & Dake Jiang & Yang Gao & Xiaomin Du, 2020. "Does ethics really matter to the sustainability of new ventures? The relationship between entrepreneurial ethics, firm visibility and entrepreneurial performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    21. Mazzucchelli, Alice & Gurioli, Martina & Graziano, Domenico & Quacquarelli, Barbara & Aouina-Mejri, Chiraz, 2021. "How to fight against food waste in the digital era: Key factors for a successful food sharing platform," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 47-58.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:8k43a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.