IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/6ru75.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Price limit regulation and herd behavior in the Vietnamese stock market

Author

Listed:
  • Ha, Tran Viet

Abstract

This paper attempts to analyze the effectiveness of price limit regulation in the context that herd behavior is prevalent in the Vietnamese stock market during the period January-2003 to August-2006. Employing the approach proposed by Kim et al. (1997) we find supporting evidences for the three hypotheses of volatility spillover, delayed price discovery process, and trade interference. By using the model of Christea and Huang (1995) with some modification and extension we realize herding behavior occurs quite frequently, whenever the market moves at least 1% or after large price changes of individual stocks appear. However, as the herding pattern is likely the same after the large individual returns regardless of limit-hit existence, it is hardly an alternative explanation for the three hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Ha, Tran Viet, 2007. "Price limit regulation and herd behavior in the Vietnamese stock market," OSF Preprints 6ru75, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6ru75
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6ru75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6278ee0c1e229b346788fff2/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/6ru75?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Connolly & Chris Stivers, 2003. "Momentum and Reversals in Equity‐Index Returns During Periods of Abnormal Turnover and Return Dispersion," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1521-1556, August.
    2. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2004. "New empirical results on anomalies and herd behavior: Vietnam stock market 2000-2004," OSF Preprints zk7ax, Center for Open Science.
    3. David Hirshleifer & Siew Hong Teoh, 2003. "Herd Behaviour and Cascading in Capital Markets: a Review and Synthesis," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 9(1), pages 25-66, March.
    4. André Farber & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2004. "Some new results on anomalies and herd behavior: Vietnam stock market," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/14174, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Miller, M.H., 1989. "Commentary: Volatility, Prices Resolution, And Effectiveness Of Price Limits," Papers t8, Columbia - Center for Futures Markets.
    6. Kim, Kenneth & Rhee, S Ghon, 1997. "Price Limit Performance: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 885-899, June.
    7. Seasholes, Mark S. & Wu, Guojun, 2007. "Predictable behavior, profits, and attention," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 590-610, December.
    8. Lehmann, B.N., 1989. "Commentary: Volatility, Price Resolution, And The Effectiveness Of Price Limits," Papers t9, Columbia - Center for Futures Markets.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sayyed Sadaqat Hussain Shah & Muhammad Asif Khan & Natanya Meyer & Daniel F. Meyer & Judit Oláh, 2019. "Does Herding Bias Drive the Firm Value? Evidence from the Chinese Equity Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diefeng Peng & Yulei Rao & Mei Wang, 2016. "Do Top 10 Lists of Daily Stock Returns Attract Investor Attention? Evidence from a Natural Experiment," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 565-593, December.
    2. Chan, Soon Huat & Kim, Kenneth A. & Rhee, S. Ghon, 2005. "Price limit performance: evidence from transactions data and the limit order book," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 269-290, March.
    3. Kenneth A. Kim & Haixiao Liu & J. Jimmy Yang, 2013. "Reconsidering Price Limit Effectiveness," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 36(4), pages 493-518, December.
    4. Imtiaz Mohammad Sifat & Azhar Mohamad, 2019. "Circuit breakers as market stability levers: A survey of research, praxis, and challenges," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(3), pages 1130-1169, July.
    5. Deb, Saikat Sovan & Kalev, Petko S & Marisetty, Vijaya B, 2017. "Price limits and volatility," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 142-156.
    6. Wang, Yuchen & Cao, Xiaping & Wang, Xiaoming & Zhou, Sili, 2023. "Does price limit improve price discovery? Evidence from IPO market in a quasi-natural experiment," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Hao Li & Zhisheng Li, 2022. "The effect of daily price limits on stock liquidity: Evidence from the Chinese stock market," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(5), pages 4885-4917, December.
    8. Deb, Saikat Sovan & Kalev, Petko S. & Marisetty, Vijaya B., 2013. "Flexible price limits: The case of Tokyo Stock Exchange," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 66-84.
    9. Deb, Saikat Sovan & Kalev, Petko S. & Marisetty, Vijaya B., 2010. "Are price limits really bad for equity markets?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2462-2471, October.
    10. Rajkumar Janardanan & Xiao Qiao & K. Geert Rouwenhorst, 2019. "On commodity price limits," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(8), pages 946-961, August.
    11. Kim, Kenneth A., 2001. "Price limits and stock market volatility," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 131-136, April.
    12. Chu, Shan-Ying & Chan, Lin Kun & Yeh, Jin-Huei, 2019. "The stabilizing effects of price limits: New evidence from jump contributed price variations," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 529-539.
    13. Reiffen, David & Buyuksahin, Bahattin, 2010. "The puzzle of privately-imposed price limits: are the limits imposed by financial exchanges effective?," MPRA Paper 35927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Chen, Jian & Qi, Shuyuan, 2024. "Limit-hitting exciting effects: Modeling jump dependencies in stock markets adhering to daily price-limit rules," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    15. Li, Huimin & Zheng, Dazhi & Chen, Jun, 2014. "Effectiveness, cause and impact of price limit—Evidence from China's cross-listed stocks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 217-241.
    16. Huang, Yen-Sheng & Fu, Tze-Wei & Ke, Mei-Chu, 2001. "Daily price limits and stock price behavior: evidence from the Taiwan stock exchange," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 263-288, July.
    17. Sifat, Imtiaz Mohammad & Mohamad, Azhar, 2020. "A survey on the magnet effect of circuit breakers in financial markets," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 138-151.
    18. Chia-Hsuan Yeh & Chun-Yi Yang, 2013. "Do price limits hurt the market?," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 8(1), pages 125-153, April.
    19. Henke, Harald & Voronkova, Svitlana, 2005. "Price limits on a call auction market: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 439-453.
    20. Tang, Siyuan, 2023. "Price limit performance: New evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China's ChiNext market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6ru75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.