IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/metaar/ukvw7.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multiversal Methods and Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Cantone, Giulio Giacomo
  • Tomaselli, Venera

Abstract

Multiverse analysis is a paradigm for estimation of the uncertainty regarding the veracity of a scientific claim, through a systemic not random sampling of a massive set of specifications of a model, which is the multiverse. Specifications, once fit on a sample, result in statistics. Observation of the variability of result statistics across groups of specifications is considered useful for checking the robustness of the claim or for better understanding its premises. However, the assumptions behind these procedures are not explicit and not always univocal: generally, the proprieties of a multiversal sample hold uniformly only for non-parametric assumptions. A new formal categorisation of the analytical choices in modelling is proposed. It helps to make the assumption of the multiverse more transparent and to check the parametric assumption. These theories are applied to the panel dataset. The analytical process is documented from the design of the hypothesis to the computation of the distribution of estimates for the same generalised linear effect. The analysis highlights the sensitivity of the model to the estimation of fixed covariates in the panel and how these results are so sensitive to this decision to twist the estimates of the linear effect. In the conclusion, the theory of multiversal sampling is related to the debate on how to weigh a multiverse.

Suggested Citation

  • Cantone, Giulio Giacomo & Tomaselli, Venera, 2023. "Multiversal Methods and Applications," MetaArXiv ukvw7, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:ukvw7
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ukvw7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6458f27d48dc1f1f55bd66dc/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ukvw7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Breznau, Nate & Rinke, Eike Mark & Wuttke, Alexander & Nguyen, Hung H V & Adem, Muna & Adriaans, Jule & Alvarez-Benjumea, Amalia & Andersen, Henrik K & Auer, Daniel & Azevedo, Flavio & Bahnsen, Oke & , 2022. "Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty," Other publications TiSEM ddeb26bf-71be-4ea6-a7b9-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Nate Breznau & Eike Mark Rinke & Alexander Wuttke & Hung H. V. Nguyen & Muna Adem & Jule Adriaans & Amalia Alvarez-Benjumea & Henrik K. Andersen & Daniel Auer & Flavio Azevedo & Oke Bahnsen & Dave Bal, 2022. "Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 119(44), pages 2203150119-, November.
    3. Agresti, Alan & Caffo, Brian & Ohman-Strickland, Pamela, 2004. "Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remedies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 639-653, October.
    4. Breznau, Nate & Rinke, Eike Mark & Wuttke, Alexander & Nguyen, Hung H. V. & Adem, Muna & Adriaans, Jule & Alvarez-Benjumea, Amalia & Andersen, Henrik K. & Auer, Daniel & Azevedo, Flavio & Bahnsen, Oke, 2022. "Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 119(44), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cantone, Giulio Giacomo & Tomaselli, Venera, 2023. "A Multiversal Model of Vibration of Effects of the Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being (BES) on Fertility," MetaArXiv z5msx, Center for Open Science.
    2. Christoph Huber & Anna Dreber & Jürgen Huber & Magnus Johannesson & Michael Kirchler & Utz Weitzel & Miguel Abellán & Xeniya Adayeva & Fehime Ceren Ay & Kai Barron & Zachariah Berry & Werner Bönte , 2023. "Competition and moral behavior: A meta-analysis of forty-five crowd-sourced experimental designs," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 120(23), pages 2215572120-, June.
    3. Felix Holzmeister & Magnus Johannesson & Robert Böhm & Anna Dreber & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler, 2023. "Heterogeneity in effect size estimates: Empirical evidence and practical implications," Working Papers 2023-17, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    4. Yu, Bin, 2023. "What is uncertainty in today’s practice of data science?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(1).
    5. Iddi Samuel & Nwoko Esther O., 2017. "Effect of covariate misspecifications in the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 23(2), pages 111-120, June.
    6. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    7. Francesco BARTOLUCCI & Silvia BACCI & Claudia PIGINI, 2015. "A Misspecification Test for Finite-Mixture Logistic Models for Clustered Binary and Ordered Responses," Working Papers 410, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    8. Fei Jiang & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "A Semi-parametric Transformation Frailty Model for Semi-competing Risks Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 112-129, March.
    9. Huang, Xianzheng, 2011. "Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 703-714, January.
    10. Francis K. C. Hui & Samuel Müller & Alan H. Welsh, 2021. "Random Effects Misspecification Can Have Severe Consequences for Random Effects Inference in Linear Mixed Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 186-206, April.
    11. Axel Munk & Tatyana Krivobokova, 2009. "Comments on: Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 256-259, August.
    12. Caffo, Brian & An, Ming-Wen & Rohde, Charles, 2007. "Flexible random intercept models for binary outcomes using mixtures of normals," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5220-5235, July.
    13. Liu, Li & Xiang, Liming, 2019. "Missing covariate data in generalized linear mixed models with distribution-free random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-16.
    14. Tanya P. Garcia & Yanyuan Ma, 2016. "Optimal Estimator for Logistic Model with Distribution-free Random Intercept," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 156-171, March.
    15. Bruce J. Swihart & Brian S. Caffo & Ciprian M. Crainiceanu, 2014. "A Unifying Framework for Marginalised Random-Intercept Models of Correlated Binary Outcomes," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 275-295, August.
    16. Ramesh Gupta & Cheng Peng, 2014. "Proportional odds frailty model and stochastic comparisons," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 66(5), pages 897-912, October.
    17. Saskia Litière & Ariel Alonso & Geert Molenberghs, 2007. "Type I and Type II Error Under Random-Effects Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1038-1044, December.
    18. Adeniyi, Isaac Adeola, 2020. "Bayesian Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Models Using Normal-Independent Distributions: Formulation and Applications," MPRA Paper 99165, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Li Liu & Liming Xiang, 2014. "Semiparametric estimation in generalized linear mixed models with auxiliary covariates: A pairwise likelihood approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 910-919, December.
    20. Changli Lu & Yuqin Sun & Yongge Tian, 2018. "Two competing linear random-effects models and their connections," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1101-1115, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:ukvw7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.