IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ohe/shealt/000382.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dying with Dignity

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Griffin

Abstract

This report from the Office of Health Economics looks at a very important aspect of medical care which is too often ignored. As Jane Griffin points out, about one quarter of all deaths in the United Kingdom are due to the cancers, and when deaths from other chronic diseases and those amongst the frail and elderly are added to this number, a large proportion of the population will end their days as 'terminally ill' patients. Sudden and unexpected deaths are less common. Yet very little analysis has been carried out into the best and the most effective way to care for the dying. In recent years the hospice movement and the provision of specialist nursing facilities have made an important start towards tackling more systematically the provision of appropriate care for the terminally ill. Yet. as this report points out, to an increasing extent the majority of people die in ordinary hospital wards. These often cannot cater for the deeper social and psychological needs of the dying patient and the family. The majority of people would prefer to die comfortably at home, and their relatives would like that for them too. Yet in practice this does not happen, usually because the necessary nursing and medical support is not available. Furthermore, while the hospices have set a commendable example in the control and prevention of pain in the dying, too many people still suffer during their terminal illness. In our humanitarian society this is unacceptable. Finally, although costs should always be considered in relation to the well-being of patients, there is a disturbing lack of hard economic information on the costs of different patterns of terminal care. It is clear that good quality hospice care, for example, is not a cheap option, when set against traditional hospital costs. Much more information is needed about both the costs and the benefits of different patterns of care for the dying. It is greatly to be hoped that this report will focus more attention on the needs of the terminally ill. and will stimulate new research into the ways that patients can most often be allowed to 'die with dignity'.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Griffin, 1991. "Dying with Dignity," Series on Health 000382, Office of Health Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ohe:shealt:000382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ohe.org/publications/dying-dignity/attachment-186-1991_dying_with_dignity_griffin/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Owen O'Donnell & Alan Maynard & Ken Wright, 1988. "Evaluating mental health care: the role of economics," Working Papers 050chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    2. Owen O'Donnell & Alan Maynard & Ken Wright, 1988. "The economic evaluation of mental health care: a review," Working Papers 051chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    3. Goddard, Maria, 1989. "The role of economics in the evaluation of hospice care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 19-34, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mike McKenna & Alan Maynard & Ken Wright, 1992. "Is rehabilitation cost effective?," Working Papers 101chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    2. Jean Taylor;David Taylor, 1989. "Mental Health in the 1990s: from Custody to Care?," Series on Health 000372, Office of Health Economics.
    3. Owen O'Donnell, 1989. "Mental health care policy in England: objectives, failures and reforms," Working Papers 057chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    4. Sebastian Hinde & Helen Weatherly & Gabriella Walker & Lorna K. Fraser, 2021. "What Does Economic Evaluation Mean in the Context of Children at the End of Their Life?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Dying with Dignity;

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ohe:shealt:000382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ohecouk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.