IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/traaab/222-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

International Technology Transfer Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Andrenelli

    (OECD)

  • Julien Gourdon

    (OECD)

  • Evdokia Moïsé

    (OECD)

Abstract

Concerns are growing about policies and measures that restrict market access with the effect of “forcing” technology transfer. Efforts to target forced technology transfer are complicated by the sometimes blurred line between voluntary and mutually agreed upon technology transfers and that which is perceived to be, or is in fact, compelled. This study presents a discussion of the continuum of measures related to international technology transfer (ITT) and aims to identify those measures that pose the greatest concern over their potential to compel disclosure of commercially valuable and sensitive technology. It then briefly presents information on provisions in international trade and investment agreements that are relevant to ITT. The last section presents the perspective from the private sector in order to better understand how firms engage in technology transfers through research collaboration, licensing, joint ventures, and equity investments. The analysis in this report indicates that involuntary technology transfer is a complex issue, and it aims to provide a way for policy makers to think through the issues, to apply a systematic and analytical approach to assessing which policies are of the greatest concern.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Andrenelli & Julien Gourdon & Evdokia Moïsé, 2019. "International Technology Transfer Policies," OECD Trade Policy Papers 222, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:traaab:222-en
    DOI: 10.1787/7103eabf-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/7103eabf-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/7103eabf-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. Buysse & D. Essers, 2019. "Cheating tiger, tech-savvy dragon : Are Western concerns about “unfair trade” and “Made in China 2025” justified ?," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue ii, pages 47-70, September.
    2. Bown, Chad, 2019. "The 2018 US-China Trade Conflict After 40 Years of Special Protection," CEPR Discussion Papers 13695, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Langinier, Corinne & Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & Ray Chaudhuri, Amrita, 2024. "Environmental Regulations and Green Innovation: The Role of Trade and Technology Transfer," Working Papers 2024-8, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
    4. Padmashree Gehl Sampath, 2022. "Strade Measures On Pharmaceutical Products: Can They Promote Local Production And Public Health?," Asia-Pacific Sustainable Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 29(2), pages 47-69, November.
    5. Robert W. Ciborowski & Iwona Skrodzka, 2019. "International Technology Transfer, Innovation and Economic Development of European Union Countries in 2008-2017," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 384-404.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competition; FDI; innovation; intellectual property; International trade;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:traaab:222-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tdoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.