IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/traaab/177-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Scoring and Weighting Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Massimo Geloso Grosso

    (OECD)

  • Frédéric Gonzales

    (OECD)

  • Sébastien Miroudot

    (OECD)

  • Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås

    (OECD)

  • Dorothée Rouzet

    (OECD)

  • Asako Ueno

    (OECD)

Abstract

This paper presents the scoring and weighting methodology for calculation of the services trade restrictiveness indices (STRIs) for 18 sectors. The STRIs are composite indices taking values between zero and one, zero representing an open market and one a market completely closed to foreign services providers. The scoring system is based on binary scoring. To reconcile the complexity of services trade restrictions with binary scoring, non-binary measures are broken down to multiple thresholds; complementary measures are grouped and scored as zero only if all measures in the bundle are not restrictive. Finally in cases where one restriction renders others irrelevant, those measures that are rendered irrelevant are automatically scored one. The paper presents the general methodology that applies to the core measures found in all sectors as well as sector-specific scoring where relevant.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimo Geloso Grosso & Frédéric Gonzales & Sébastien Miroudot & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Dorothée Rouzet & Asako Ueno, 2015. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Scoring and Weighting Methodology," OECD Trade Policy Papers 177, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:traaab:177-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5js7n8wbtk9r-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5js7n8wbtk9r-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5js7n8wbtk9r-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hildegunn K. Nordås & Dorothée Rouzet, 2017. "The Impact of Services Trade Restrictiveness on Trade Flows," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1155-1183, June.
    2. Camille Reverdy, 2023. "Estimating the general equilibrium effects of services trade liberalization," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 493-521, May.
    3. Shahbaz Nasir & Kaliappa Kalirajan, 2016. "Information and Communication Technology-Enabled Modern Services Export Performances of Asian Economies," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 33(1), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Reto Föllmi & Angela Fuest & Philipp an de Meulen & Martin Micheli & Torsten Schmidt & Lina Zwick, 2018. "Openness and productivity of the Swiss economy," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 154(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Peter R. Herman, 2022. "A pragmatic approach to estimating nondiscriminatory non‐tariff trade costs," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1258-1287, September.
    6. Daniel Schwanen & Dan Ciuriak & Jeremy Kronick, 2015. "Opening up New Trade Routes for Financial Services: Canada’s Priorities," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 442, December.
    7. Hoekman, Bernard & Shepherd, Ben, 2021. "Services Trade Policies and Economic Integration: New Evidence for Developing Countries," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 115-134, February.
    8. Anirudh Shingal, 2023. "Mode 4 restrictiveness and services trade," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 159(3), pages 757-786, August.
    9. Dadkhah, Ali & Ciuriak, Dan, 2018. "Evaluating the Impact of FTAs on FDI: A Text-Based Approach," Conference papers 332959, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Adam Sadowski & Katarzyna Wąsowska & Iwo Nowak, 2020. "Logistics Development in European Countries: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 500-514.
    11. Van Der Marel,Erik Leendert & Shepherd,Ben, 2020. "Trade Facilitation in Services : Concepts and Empirical Importance," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9234, The World Bank.
    12. Kazuhiro Sugie & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Sébastien Miroudot & Frédéric Gonzales & Dorothée Rouzet, 2015. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Logistics Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 183, OECD Publishing.
    13. Olga Pindyuk, 2019. "The Future of UK Services Trade Post-Brexit: Unlikely to Be Bright," wiiw Policy Notes 31, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    composite indicators; services trade restrictions;

    JEL classification:

    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:traaab:177-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tdoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.