IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaab/260-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

New Forms of Work in the Digital Economy

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

This paper provides new evidence on the development of online platforms and explores the emergence of new forms of work in the digital economy. Following the rise of platforms that match demand and supply of goods (e-commerce) and information (search, social networks), platform markets for services traded over the Internet (the "x"-economy) have grown exponentially in recent years. The paper analyses how online platforms affect the organisation of markets and work; discusses related opportunities and challenges for individuals participating in such markets; presents analysis of trends and effects of non-standard work in OECD countries; and identifies policy issues related to new forms of work. It finds that the transformative effects of online platforms may challenge existing institutions and might necessitate reviews of policy and regulatory frameworks in many areas. To further analyse such digital transformation, better data is needed on the effects of online platforms in all of these areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2016. "New Forms of Work in the Digital Economy," OECD Digital Economy Papers 260, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:stiaab:260-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jlwnklt820x-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwnklt820x-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jlwnklt820x-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nersessian, David, 2018. "The law and ethics of big data analytics: A new role for international human rights in the search for global standards," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 845-854.
    2. Michele Cantarella & Chiara Strozzi, 2018. "Labour market effects of crowdwork in the US and EU: an empirical investigation," Center for Economic Research (RECent) 140, University of Modena and Reggio E., Dept. of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    3. Michele Cantarella & Chiara Strozzi, 2021. "Workers in the crowd: the labor market impact of the online platform economy [An evaluation of instrumental variable strategies for estimating the effects of catholic schooling]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1429-1458.
    4. Hösl, Maximilian & Kniep,Ronja, 2020. "Auf den Spuren eines Politikfeldes: Die Institutionalisierung von Internetpolitik in der Ministerialverwaltung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-235.
    5. Michele Cantarella & Chiara Strozzi, 2018. "Labour market effects of crowdwork in US and EU: an empirical investigation," Department of Economics 0139, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    6. Maciej Czaplewski, 2018. "Tworzenie jednolitego rynku usług telekomunikacyjnych w Unii Europejskiej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 159-181.
    7. Song, Quanyun & Li, Jie & Wu, Yu & Yin, Zhichao, 2020. "Accessibility of financial services and household consumption in China: Evidence from micro data," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    8. Barslund, Mikkel, 2017. "Programming Brexit: How will the UK�s IT sector fare?," CEPS Papers 12687, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    9. Jean-Marc Zogheib & Marc Bourreau, 2021. "Public vs. Private Investments In Network Industries," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-4, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    10. Arno Städtler, 2016. "Leasing wächst kräftiger als die Anlageinvestitionen – geringere Dynamik für 2017 erwartet," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(23), pages 52-63, December.
    11. Maier, Michael F. & Viete, Steffen & Ody, Margard, 2017. "Plattformbasierte Erwerbsarbeit: Stand der empirischen Forschung," IZA Research Reports 81, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Diane Coyle & Shane O'Connor, 2019. "Understanding the Sharing Economy," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2019-04, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    13. Annabelle Mourougane & Balazs Egert & Mark Baker & Gábor Fülöp, 2020. "The Policy Drivers of Self-Employment: New Evidence from Europe," CESifo Working Paper Series 8780, CESifo.
    14. Kostrytsya V., Burlai T., 2019. "Undeclared work as a new normality globally and in Ukraine," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 1, pages 7-34.
    15. Salvi, Antonio & Vitolla, Filippo & Rubino, Michele & Giakoumelou, Anastasia & Raimo, Nicola, 2021. "Online information on digitalisation processes and its impact on firm value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 437-444.
    16. Valerio De Stefano & Antonio Aloisi, 2018. "European legal framework for "digital labour platforms"," JRC Research Reports JRC112243, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Bazi, Saleh & Filieri, Raffaele & Gorton, Matthew, 2020. "Customers’ motivation to engage with luxury brands on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 223-235.
    18. Maarten Goos & Melanie Arntz & Ulrich Zierahn & Terry Gregory & Stephanie Carretero Gomez & Ignacio Gonzalez Vazquez & Koen Jonkers, 2019. "The Impact of Technological Innovation on the Future of Work," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-03, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Cantarella, Michele & Strozzi, Chiara, 2019. "Workers in the Crowd: The Labour Market Impact of the Online Platform Economy," IZA Discussion Papers 12327, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Heiland, Heiner, 2020. "Workers' Voice in platform labour: An Overview," WSI Studies 21, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    21. Bertschek, Irene & Arnold, Daniel & Erdsiek, Daniel & Nicolay, Katharina & Bieber, Daniel & Kreutzer, Elena, 2018. "Arbeiten 4.0 - Chancen und Herausforderungen für Luxemburg. Studie im Auftrag von Arbeitsministerium, Handelskammer, Arbeitnehmerkammer Luxemburg," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 181909.
    22. Morrisson Kaunda Mutuku & Stephen M. A. Muathe, 2020. "Nexus Analysis: Internet of Things and Business Performance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(4), pages 175-181, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stiaab:260-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.