IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaab/179-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Protection of Children Online: Risks Faced by Children Online and Policies to Protect Them

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

As increasing numbers of children worldwide enjoy the benefits of the Internet, they also face a spectrum of risks to which they are more vulnerable than adults. This report examines these risks as well as the policy responses of governments and other stakeholders to improve the protection of children online.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2011. "The Protection of Children Online: Risks Faced by Children Online and Policies to Protect Them," OECD Digital Economy Papers 179, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:stiaab:179-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5kgcjf71pl28-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgcjf71pl28-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5kgcjf71pl28-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Altarturi, Hamza H.M. & Saadoon, Muntadher & Anuar, Nor Badrul, 2020. "Cyber parental control: A bibliometric study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Jasmina Byrne & Kerry Albright & Daniel Kardefelt-Winther, 2016. "Using research findings for policymaking," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 71265, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Sonia Livingstone & Peter K. Smith, 2014. "Annual research review: harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 55691, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stiaab:179-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.