IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduddd/67-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PISA 2015 Results in Focus

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

Over the past decade, the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA, has become the world’s premier yardstick for evaluating the quality, equity and efficiency of school systems. This special issue of the PISA in Focus series highlights the results of the first two volumes of the PISA 2015 initial report: Excellence and Equity in Education; and Policies and Practices for Successful Schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2016. "PISA 2015 Results in Focus," PISA in Focus 67, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduddd:67-en
    DOI: 10.1787/aa9237e6-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/aa9237e6-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/aa9237e6-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quezada, George & Adcock, M & Bratanova, Alexandra & Ponce Reyes, R & Hajkowicz, Stefan, 2017. "Surfing the Digital Tsunami: Scenarios Report. Preliminary scenarios exploring the decade ahead for Australian business and the economy," MPRA Paper 113820, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Guanhua Fang & Zhiliang Ying, 2020. "Latent Theme Dictionary Model for Finding Co-occurrent Patterns in Process Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 775-811, September.
    3. Henriques, C.O. & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O.D., 2021. "Efficiency of secondary schools in Portugal: A novel DEA hybrid approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Alexandra Valéria Sándor, 2020. "Motivations and Self-Perceived Career Prospects of Undergraduate Sociology Students," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduddd:67-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.