IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaaf/45-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fields of education, gender and the labour market

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

More and more adults are earning a tertiary qualification, but not all tertiary degrees have the same value on the labour market. In general, postgraduate degrees such as master’s and doctoral degrees are associated with higher employment rates and earnings than bachelor’s degrees. Labour market outcomes also vary by field of education. Some fields of education differ markedly in their gender composition, reflecting the sex-typing of occupations and gender stereotypes. Graduates’ field of education is closely related with their occupational choices; therefore a better understanding of gender disparities in this area can help to identify some of the mechanisms that lie behind gender differences in the labour market and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2016. "Fields of education, gender and the labour market," Education Indicators in Focus 45, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaaf:45-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jlpgh1ppm30-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpgh1ppm30-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jlpgh1ppm30-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raquel Tebaldi & Charlotte Bilo, 2017. "Gender-sensitive social protection in the Caribbean," One Pager 352, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    2. Bütikofer, Aline & Jensen, Sissel & Salvanes, Kjell G., 2018. "The role of parenthood on the gender gap among top earners," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 103-123.
    3. Hagleitner, Wolfgang & Sting, Stephan & Maran, Thomas, 2022. "Socio-economic status and living situation of care leavers in Austria," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. José M. Cordero & Víctor Cristóbal & Daniel Santín, 2018. "Causal Inference On Education Policies: A Survey Of Empirical Studies Using Pisa, Timss And Pirls," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 878-915, July.
    5. Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan & Bennett, Rohan, 2023. "Women’s access to land and the Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Requirements, modelling and assessment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    6. Hutcheson, Walter & Hoagland, Porter & Jin, Di, 2018. "Valuing environmental education as a cultural ecosystem service at Hudson River Park," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 387-394.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaaf:45-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.