IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/105-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Closely is the Distribution of Skills Related to Countries' Overall Level of Social Inequality and Economic Prosperity?

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk Van Damme

    (OECD)

Abstract

A country’s level of human capital – the knowledge and skills in the population – has a strong bearing on its economic potential for growth and prosperity. On the other hand, its level of social inequality might prevent prosperity to be shared in equitable ways across the population. This papers looks at the relationship between the distribution of numeracy skills in the population to measures of economic prosperity (per capita GDP) and social inequality (Gini coefficient). Country-level correlations between various measures of the skills dispersion and these two indicators are presented. The correlations suggest that a higher numeracy skills dispersion is related to higher social inequality. A higher share of low-skilled adults relates positively with greater social inequality, while a higher share of high-skilled adults seems to be related with higher levels of economic output. Le niveau du capital humain dans un pays - les connaissances et les compétences de la population - a une forte influence sur son potentiel de croissance économique et sa prospérité. D'autre part, son niveau d'inégalité sociale pourrait empêcher le partage équitable de la richesse entre tous les groupes de la population. Ce papier se penche sur la relation entre d’une part la répartition des compétences en numératie de la population, et d’autre part des mesures de prospérité économique (PIB par habitant) et d’inégalités sociales (coefficient de Gini). Les corrélations au niveau des pays entre les différentes mesures de la dispersion des compétences et ces deux indicateurs sont présentés. Ces corrélations suggèrent qu’une dispersion plus élevée des compétences en numératie est liée à un niveau d'inégalité sociale plus élevé. Une proportion plus élevée d'adultes peu qualifiés est associée positivement à une plus grande inégalité sociale, tandis qu'un pourcentage plus important d’adultes hautement qualifiés semble être lié à des niveaux plus élevés de production économique.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk Van Damme, 2014. "How Closely is the Distribution of Skills Related to Countries' Overall Level of Social Inequality and Economic Prosperity?," OECD Education Working Papers 105, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:105-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jxvd5rk3tnx-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxvd5rk3tnx-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jxvd5rk3tnx-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simplice A. Asongu & Nicholas M. Odhiambo & Mushfiqur Rahman, 2024. "Information Technology, Inequality, and Adult Literacy in Developing Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3927-3945, March.
    2. Dries Lens & François Levrau, 2020. "Can Pre-entry Characteristics Account for the Ethnic Attainment Gap? An Analysis of a Flemish University," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(1), pages 26-50, February.
    3. Marco Paccagnella, 2015. "Skills and Wage Inequality: Evidence from PIAAC," OECD Education Working Papers 114, OECD Publishing.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:105-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.