IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/agraaa/38-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Practical Considerations in Using Bioeconomic Modelling for Rebuilding Fisheries

Author

Listed:
  • Sherry L. Larkin

    (University of Florida)

  • Sergio Alvarez

    (University of Florida)

  • Gil Sylvia

    (Oregon State University)

  • Michael Harte

    (Oregon State University)

Abstract

Many of the world.s fish stocks are considered to be in need of rebuilding. In response, global agreements, including UNCLOS, have sought to adopt some (optimal) level of fish biomass, usually the level associated with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY). While establishing a sustainable level of harvest is goal with intuitive appeal, the pursuit of MSY ignores many relevant economic and social factors that are critical to the sustainability of a fishery.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherry L. Larkin & Sergio Alvarez & Gil Sylvia & Michael Harte, 2011. "Practical Considerations in Using Bioeconomic Modelling for Rebuilding Fisheries," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 38, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:agraaa:38-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5kgk9qclw7mv-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgk9qclw7mv-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5kgk9qclw7mv-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L. Doyen & A. A. Cissé & N. Sanz & F. Blanchard & J.-C. Pereau, 2018. "The Tragedy of Open Ecosystems," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 117-140, March.
    2. Sean Pascoe & Roy Aijun Deng & Trevor Hutton & Denham Parker, 2023. "Determining the Appropriate Minimum Effort Levels for Use in Fisheries Dynamic Bioeconomic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. L. Doyen & A. Cissé & S. Gourguet & L. Mouysset & P.-Y. Hardy & C. Béné & F. Blanchard & F. Jiguet & J.-C. Pereau & O. Thébaud, 2013. "Ecological-economic modelling for the sustainable management of biodiversity," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 353-364, December.
    4. Hans Frost & Peder Andersen & Ayoe Hoff, 2013. "Management of Complex Fisheries: Lessons Learned from a Simulation Model," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 61(2), pages 283-307, June.
    5. José-María Da-Rocha & Javier García-Cutrín & Raul Prellezo & Jaume Sempere, 2017. "The social cost of fishery subsidy reforms," Serie documentos de trabajo del Centro de Estudios Económicos 2017-02, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos.
    6. Stefano Mainardi, 2021. "Parametric and Semiparametric Efficiency Frontiers in Fishery Analysis: Overview and Case Study on the Falkland Islands," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(2), pages 169-210, June.
    7. Alvarez, Sergio & Solis, Daniel & Hwang, Joonghyun, 2017. "An Economic Analysis of Shellfish Harvests Regulations for Food Safety," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252721, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Adriana Gama, 2017. "Standards, taxes and social welfare," Serie documentos de trabajo del Centro de Estudios Económicos 2017-04, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos.
    9. CISSE Abdoul & SANZ Nicolas & BLANCHARD Fabien & DOYEN Luc & PEREAU Jean-Christophe, 2015. "The tragedy of ecosystems in open-access," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2015-02, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    10. Ji-Hoon Choi & Jae-Bong Lee & Sang-Chul Yoon & Do-Hoon Kim, 2021. "A Bioeconomic Analysis of the Sandfish ( Arctoscopus japonicus ) Management Policies of the Eastern Sea Danish Fishery in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Luz Maria Castro & Fabian Härtl & Santiago Ochoa & Baltazar Calvas & Leonardo Izquierdo & Thomas Knoke, 2018. "Integrated bio-economic models as tools to support land-use decision making: a review of potential and limitations," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 183-211, July.
    12. Alvarez, Sergio & Solís, Daniel & Hwang, Joonghyun, 2019. "Modeling shellfish harvest policies for food safety: Wild oyster harvest restrictions to prevent foodborne Vibrio vulnificus," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 219-230.
    13. repec:grm:ecoyun:201712 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. A.A. Cisse & L. Doyen & F. Blanchard & J.C. Pereau, 2013. "Stochastic viability of the coastal fishery in French Guiana," Documents de Travail 2013-07, CEREGMIA, Université des Antilles et de la Guyane.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bioeconomic Modelling; fisheries economics; fisheries management; fisheries rebuilding; North Atlantic Cod; Northern Prawns; Norwegian Spring Spawning Herring; Spiny Lobster; Striped bass;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery
    • Q27 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Issues in International Trade

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:agraaa:38-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tdoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.