IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nmp/nuland/2009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Métodos mixtos para el estudio de las decisiones estratégicas en las PyMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Baltar, Fabiola
  • Gentile, Natacha

Abstract

Tradicionalmente la literatura sobre el análisis de las decisiones estratégicas se ha sustentado en modelos teóricos que bien se ajustan a describir el comportamiento de las grandes empresas pero que presentan algunos problemas de aplicación al entorno de las PyMEs. Es por ello que en la actualidad se evidencia una creciente necesidad por indagar en las diferencias para promover la construcción de teorías que incorporen el contexto y las características específicas de las PyMEs. Esta necesidad implica, simultáneamente, discutir acerca del modo de abordaje empírico y las estrategias de investigación utilizadas para analizar los procesos decisorios teniendo en cuenta las especificidades del sector. De ahí que, el objetivo de este artículo es presentar una revisión teórica y metodológica de los estudios publicados en el ámbito de las decisiones estratégicas en las PyMEs y presentar, a modo ilustrativo, un diseño metodológico integral que permita caracterizar los perfiles decisorios y las prácticas observadas en este tipo de empresas. La hipótesis es que el uso de métodos mixtos mejora la fiabilidad de los resultados ya que favorece la triangulación de datos (cuantitativos y cualitativos) y permite captar las características idiosincráticas. Además, facilita la elaboración de modelos integrales y naturalizados que amplían la comprensión del fenómeno estudiado.

Suggested Citation

  • Baltar, Fabiola & Gentile, Natacha, 2012. "Métodos mixtos para el estudio de las decisiones estratégicas en las PyMEs," Nülan. Deposited Documents 2009, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    • Handle: RePEc:nmp:nuland:2009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://nulan.mdp.edu.ar/id/eprint/2009/1/2009.pdf
    File Function: published
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeroen de Jong & Petra Gibcus & Patrick Vermeulen, 2004. "Strategic Decision-Making in Small Firms: Towards a Typology of Entrepreneurial Decision-Makers," Scales Research Reports N200416, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    2. Simon, Herbert A, 1979. "Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 493-513, September.
    3. Sterman, John D., 1989. "Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 301-335, June.
    4. Nicholas O'Regan & Abby Ghobadian, 2004. "Re-visiting the strategy-performance question: an empirical analysis," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2/3), pages 144-170.
    5. John D. Sterman, 1989. "Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 321-339, March.
    6. Frances Fabian & Henry Molina & Giuseppe Labianca, 2009. "Understanding Decisions to Internationalize by Small and Medium-sized Firms Located in an Emerging Market," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 537-563, October.
    7. Danny Miller, 1987. "The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 55-76, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grigoriev, Alexander & Jung, Verena & Peeters - Rutten, Marianne & Vredeveld, Tjark, 2017. "On the Acceptance of Gain Sharing Methods in Supply Chain Collaboration," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    2. K. Skylar Powell, 2017. "Understanding ‘Misfits’: Aspirations and Systematic Deviations from Firm-Specific Optimal Multinationality," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 529-544, August.
    3. Barbara B. Flynn & Xenophon Koufteros & Guanyi Lu, 2016. "On Theory in Supply Chain Uncertainty and its Implications for Supply Chain Integration," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 3-27, July.
    4. Roubík, Hynek & Mazancová, Jana & Rydval, Jan & Kvasnička, Roman, 2020. "Uncovering the dynamic complexity of the development of small–scale biogas technology through causal loops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 235-243.
    5. Arango, Santiago & Castañeda, Jaime A. & Larsen, Erik R., 2013. "Mothballing in power markets: An experimental study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 125-134.
    6. Patricia Ann McKay & Christine A. Vogt & Laura Schmitt Olabisi, 2017. "Development and testing a diagnostic capacity tool for improving socio-ecological system governance," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 156-183, June.
    7. Pastore, Erica & Alfieri, Arianna & Zotteri, Giulio, 2019. "An empirical investigation on the antecedents of the bullwhip effect: Evidence from the spare parts industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 121-133.
    8. Berry, D. & Naim, M. M., 1996. "Quantifying the relative improvements of redesign strategies in a P.C. supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 181-196, December.
    9. Towill, Denis R. & Zhou, Li & Disney, Stephen M., 2007. "Reducing the bullwhip effect: Looking through the appropriate lens," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 444-453, July.
    10. Oliva, Rogelio, 2003. "Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 552-568, December.
    11. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    12. Ma, Yungao & Wang, Nengmin & He, Zhengwen & Lu, Jizhou & Liang, Huigang, 2015. "Analysis of the bullwhip effect in two parallel supply chains with interacting price-sensitive demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 815-825.
    13. Rich, Karl M. & Ross, R. Brent & Baker, A. Derek & Negassa, Asfaw, 2011. "Quantifying value chain analysis in the context of livestock systems in developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 214-222, April.
    14. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2012. "Bullwhip Effect Measurement and Its Implications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 771-784, August.
    15. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    16. Gérard P. Cachon & Paul H. Zipkin, 1999. "Competitive and Cooperative Inventory Policies in a Two-Stage Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 936-953, July.
    17. Zhang, Xiaolong & Burke, Gerard J., 2011. "Analysis of compound bullwhip effect causes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 514-526, May.
    18. Lin, Jinchai & Fan, Ruguo & Tan, Xianchun & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2021. "Dynamic decision and coordination in a low-carbon supply chain considering the retailer's social preference," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Arunachalam Narayanan & Brent B. Moritz, 2015. "Decision Making and Cognition in Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: An Experimental Study," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1216-1234, August.
    20. Charles L. Munson & Jianli Hu & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 2003. "Teaching the Costs of Uncoordinated Supply Chains," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 24-39, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nmp:nuland:2009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristian Merlino S. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femdpar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.