IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/new/wpaper/1906.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rethinking growth and inequality in the US: What is the role of measurement of GDP?

Author

Listed:
  • Remzi Baris Tercioglu

    (Department of Economics, New School for Social Research)

Abstract

Five sectors have increased their contribution to US growth post-1973: Professional-business services (PBS), finance, information, healthcare, and arts-entertainment. Among these services, finance, healthcare, and PBS have questionable foundations to be regarded as final consumption. The paper develops a sectoral explanation to stagnation in median income and wages since the mid-1970s by treating finance, healthcare, and PBS as intermediate consumption of the economy. The adjusted real output growth per annum is 16% lower than the real GDP growth over 1973-2017, yet the decline is 5% over 1947-1973. Consumption share of GDP declines from 63% in 1947 to 61% in 2016 after adjustments despite rising consumerism over the same period. On the income side, the compensation of employees (CE) share of output declines sharply after the 1980s as more than 90% of the expenditures on finance, healthcare and PBS are financed out of the CE. The paper contributes to growth and inequality literature by introducing a new measure of real output growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Remzi Baris Tercioglu, 2019. "Rethinking growth and inequality in the US: What is the role of measurement of GDP?," Working Papers 1906, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2020.
    • Handle: RePEc:new:wpaper:1906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/econ/2019/NSSR_WP_062019.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William D. Nordhaus & James Tobin, 1973. "Is Growth Obsolete?," NBER Chapters, in: The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, pages 509-564, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Deepankar Basu & Duncan K. Foley, 2013. "Dynamics of output and employment in the US economy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(5), pages 1077-1106.
    3. Simon Kuznets, 1951. "Government Product And National Income," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 1(1), pages 178-244, March.
    4. Thomas Piketty, 2015. "About Capital in the Twenty-First Century," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 48-53, May.
    5. William D. Nordhaus & James Tobin, 1972. "Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect, Volume 5, Economic Growth," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number nord72-1.
    6. Jacob Assa, 2016. "The Financialization of GDP and its Implications for Macroeconomic Debates," Working Papers 1610, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    7. Eisner, Robert, 1988. "Extended Accounts for National Income and Product," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 26(4), pages 1611-1684, December.
    8. Jacob Assa, 2015. "Financial Output as Economic Input: Resolving the Inconsistent Treatment of Financial Services in the National Accounts," Working Papers 1501, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    9. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01157487 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lintott, John, 1996. "Environmental accounting: useful to whom and for what?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 179-190, March.
    2. Katharine G. Abraham, 2014. "Expanded Measurement of Economic Activity: Progress and Prospects," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress, pages 25-42, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Savatore Puglisi & Ionuț Virgil Șerban, 2019. "Beyond Gdp: Which Options To Better Represent Modern Socio-Economic Progress?," Sociology and Social Work Review, International Society for projects in Education and Research, vol. 3(1), pages 17-32, June.
    5. Guido Bonatti & Enrico Ivaldi, 2016. "Un indicatore per la misurazione della partecipazione culturale e sociale nelle regioni italiane," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 283-302.
    6. Jochimsen Beate & Raffer Christian, 2018. "Herausforderungen bei der Messung von Wohlfahrt," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 67(1), pages 63-100, May.
    7. Goletsis, Y. & Chletsos, M., 2011. "Measurement of development and regional disparities in Greek periphery: A multivariate approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 174-183, December.
    8. Amjad Ali & Marc Audi & Chan Bibi & Yannick Roussel, 2021. "The Impact of Gender Inequality and Environmental Degradation on Human Well-being in the Case of Pakistan: A Time Series Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 92-99.
    9. Hamilton,Kirk E. & Helliwell,John F. & Woolcock,Michael, 2016. "Social capital, trust, and well-being in the evaluation of wealth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7707, The World Bank.
    10. Quamrul H. Ashraf & Ashley Lester & David N. Weil, 2009. "When Does Improving Health Raise GDP?," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2008, Volume 23, pages 157-204, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Curtis, John, 2012. "The Environment Review 2012," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS26.
    12. Gregory Ponthiere, 2007. "Monetizing Longevity Gains under Welfare Interdependencies: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 449-469, September.
    13. Parantap Basu & Tooraj Jamasb, 2019. "On Green Growth with Sustainable Capital," Working Papers 2019_06, Durham University Business School.
    14. Quamrul H. Ashraf & David N. Weil & Joshua Wilde, 2011. "The Effect of Interventions to Reduce Fertility on Economic Growth," NBER Working Papers 17377, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Christopher House & John Laitner & Dmitriy Stolyarov, 2008. "Valuing Lost Home Production Of Dual Earner Couples," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 49(2), pages 701-736, May.
    16. Letícia Wittlin Machado & Emilio Lèbre La Rovere, 2017. "The Traditional Technological Approach and Social Technologies in the Brazilian Semiarid Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Kenneth Kuttner & Adam Posen, 2011. "How Flexible Can Inflation Targeting Be and Still Work?," Department of Economics Working Papers 2011-10, Department of Economics, Williams College, revised Sep 2011.
    18. Daniel Fehder & Michael Porter & Scott Stern, 2018. "The Empirics of Social Progress: The Interplay between Subjective Well-Being and Societal Performance," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 477-482, May.
    19. Peter Josef Stauvermann & Ronald Ravinesh Kumar & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad & Nikeel N. Kumar, 2018. "Effect of tourism on economic growth of Sri Lanka: accounting for capital per worker, exchange rate and structural breaks," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 49-68, February.
    20. Matheus Assaf & Pedro Garcia Duarte, 2018. "Utility Matters: Edmond Malinvaud and growth theory in the 1950s and 1960s," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2018_03, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    National income accounting; measurement of real output growth; functional distribution of income; labor productivity; inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E01 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth; Environmental Accounts
    • E25 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
    • D33 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Factor Income Distribution

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:new:wpaper:1906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Setterfield (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/denewus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.